[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [pkcs11] C_ChangeLabel/C_ClearToken
On 06/10/13 17:11, Tim Hudson wrote:
On 11/06/2013 1:21 AM, Michael StJohns wrote: > And again - write up a proposal. And if there is interest in tackling this area *from others* then I will do so - but without a general interest there is little point in blasting out a pile of proposals to the list. Let others express their views - and if no one else speaks up then it is a moot point.
Respectfully, that approach may not be the right one for the collection of people in this group. Silence may also mean "ain't got around it yet" or "nothing to add"; not disinterest. Personally, I don't read and absorb email from this group until the weekends. A few others may be trying to keep up as I am. When I floated my initial idea in email, I heard very little. (Not meaning M.StJohn's response was "very little".) A rational person could conclude it meant the interest just isn't there. So I let it drop. Someone told me after the next meeting that there -was- interest, only they didn't pipe up. Oh. Of course. If it will engage the reserved ones... in my own org, our initial reply to each other is sometimes only a "+1", "-1", or "0". It doesn't require a massive commitment of energy yet gives meaningful feedback to the sender. D.