Re: [pkcs11] Broken definitions in PKCS#11 wd03 draft

[Oscar So <oscar.so@oracle.com>]

Thanks Stef.
Yeah, we should do this in a batch.
The use of of pkcs11x.h is a good idea.

Also, one more thing, did you use Windows text editor to edit pkcs11t.h 
? I could see ^M characters. Would that be better to avoid ^M in the 
future ?

Best,
Oscar




On 09/17/14 10:33 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
> On 18.09.2014 02:47, Oscar So wrote:
> > Thanks Stef.
> > I just edited this Wiki page:
> > https://wiki.oasis-open.org/pkcs11/Definitions
> >
> > Added:
> > * Missing CK_ECDH2_DERIVE_PARAMS and CK_ECDH2_DERIVE_PARAMS_PTR
> > * Missing CK_CAMELLIA_CTR_PARAMS and CK_CAMELLIA_CTR_PARAMS_PTR
> > * Missing CK_TLS_PRF_PARAMS and CK_TLS_PRF_PARAMS_PTR
>
> Thanks. I hope we can do these as a batch rather than making one
> proposal for each.
>
> > I need to put the above back into pkcs11t.h in order to build our
> > existing code.
>
> That makes sense. Most of us have a local copy of of the headers, with
> an additional file containing extensions that are in the spec yet, or
> won't be (eg: pkcs11x.h).
>
> I think such a local header is an appropriate place for these
> definitions waiting for an errata.
>
> Stef
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php