Re: [pkcs11] draft minutes from 10 Sept 2014

[Tim Hudson <tjh@cryptsoft.com>]

On 24/09/2014 10:19 AM, Valerie Anne Fenwick wrote:
> https://wiki.oasis-open.org/pkcs11/MeetingMinutes/Minutes10092014

On my action item of "Tim H: send suggestions on how to handle minor
updates prior to v3.0 to the list (16072014.01)"

What I suggest we do is to gather any updates which we think make sense
and produce them as working drafts and if there is consensus then we can
progress them through to committee specification draft or even through
to committee specification level without having to go through the full
OASIS process unless there is a clear view that it is required. The
decision to move to a formal OASIS specification is one which can be
made on a case by case basis.

I also think we should be documenting any proposals for updates prior to
v3.0 as standalone documents so we have the choice of moving them
forward individually through the process and in three or six months or
so we can decide if it makes sense to bundle a collection of them together.

At least with the OASIS TC process we can move to a committee
specification draft fairly quickly - that status does not require a
public review cycle and does make it clear the TC view point on a
proposal (a full majority vote is required).

Tim.