Re: [pkcs11-comment] PKCS#11 Usage Guide vs. POSIX issue

[Tim Hudson <tjh@cryptsoft.com>]

On 10/05/2015 8:55 PM, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> This has been implemented in some cases by using a pthread_atfork()
> child handler and directly calling C_Initialize() from it, for any
> PKCS#11 providers which were loaded in the parent.

David, it appears to my reading of your email at least - that all of the
issues you are raising are related to implementation issues with
specific vendors and/or some vendors use of pthread_atfork ... and not
with the specification itself.

Tim.