[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [pkcs11-comment] PKCS#11 Usage Guide vs. POSIX issue
On 10/05/2015 8:55 PM, Woodhouse, David wrote: > This has been implemented in some cases by using a pthread_atfork() > child handler and directly calling C_Initialize() from it, for any > PKCS#11 providers which were loaded in the parent. David, it appears to my reading of your email at least - that all of the issues you are raising are related to implementation issues with specific vendors and/or some vendors use of pthread_atfork ... and not with the specification itself. Tim.