Re: [pkcs11] PKCS11: motion to move forward with AES – XTS?

[Valerie Fenwick <valerie.fenwick@oracle.com>]

As Tim pointed out, there is a typo: s/v2.40/v2.41

valerie

On 6/10/2015 11:47 AM, Valerie Fenwick wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> Would any of you be willing to move at a motion at today's meeting to
> push AES – XTS forward to ballot?
>
> It should be something like:
> "x moves that a Full Majority ballot be created to determine whether the
> TC accepts the addition of the AES-XTS mechanism to the PKCS #11 Current
> Mechanisms v2.40 as defined in the proposal (URL) by Mark Powers on
> 08-June-2015".
>
>
> Please do let me know, apologies for the late notice.
>
> Thank you, Valerie