[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [pkcs11] Groups - Add descriptions for ECDSA SHA2 and SHA3 mechanisms. uploaded
Bob, all, Last mail from myself for today… In my opinion, the proposal is a bit chatty. Is it necessary to describe all 9 SHA mechanisms in separate sections although the text is always the same – except
for the name of the mechanism? The current standard is not consistent here: For example, PKCS #1 RSA PSS signatures (sect. 2.1.17) does it in one section, DSA (sect. 2.2.12, 2.2.14 – 2.2.17) uses several sections.
So, similar to PKCS #1 RSA PSS, the following could be added to the “ECDSA with SHA-1” section (which needs to be renamed then) after the first paragraph: “The ECDSA with SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512, SHA3-224, SHA3-256, SHA3-384, and SHA3-512 mechanisms denoted CKM_ECDSA_SHA224, CKM_ECDSA_SHA256, CKM_ECDSA_SHA384,
CKM_ECDSA_SHA512, CKM_ECDSA_SHA3_224, CKM_ECDSA_SHA3_256, CKM_ECDSA_SHA3_384, and CKM_ECDSA_SHA3_512 respectively, perform the same operations using the SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512, SHA3-224, SHA3-256, SHA3-384, and SHA3-512 hash functions.” And all other new sections are obsolete. Best regards, Daniel From: pkcs11@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:pkcs11@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Robert Relyea Submitter's message
Utimaco IS GmbH Germanusstr. 4, D.52080 Aachen, Germany, Tel: +49-241-1696-0, www.utimaco.com Seat: Aachen – Registergericht Aachen HRB 18922 VAT ID No.: DE 815 496 496 Managementboard: Malte Pollmann (Chairman) CEO, Dr. Frank J. Nellissen CFO This communication is confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at https://www.utimaco.com/en/e-mail-disclaimer/ |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]