[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [pki-askvendors] Revised Ask Vendors survey
Hi Steve, I'm with you on your thoughts. Lets quickly move ahead once everyone on the SC has given their inputs. What are the next steps? U mentioned someone who could help with vendor lists, right? rgds Shivangi > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Hanna [mailto:Steve.Hanna@Sun.COM] > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 8:56 PM > To: PKI TC Ask Vendors SC > Subject: Re: [pki-askvendors] Revised Ask Vendors survey > > > Thanks for your comments, Shivangi. You have > a lot of good ideas. Here are my thoughts in > response. > > Shivangi Nadkarni wrote: > >>-------------- > >> > >>Subject: PKI Support in Your Products > >> > >>Please forward this email to the Product Manager > >>for your ??? product or someone else who has > >>insight into the process by which the feature > >>set for this product is chosen. > > > > > >> [Shivangi] - Do we need to give a small intro here saying we are > > writing to you from the OASIS PKI Technical Committee which is > looking at > > ways and means of making PKI easy to use......etc....? Just to > ensure that > > the person who receives this doesnt trash the mail, especially if he/she > > is not the concerned person to whom the survey is targetted. > > > > Or is is that these folks have already been contacted so they > dont need a > > repeat? > > Good idea. I don't want to repeat all the text > that appears later in the survey, but here's a > brief intro paragraph that could go the text > "Please forward this email ...". OK? > > We, the OASIS PKI Technical Committee, are working > to improve Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and to > remove obstacles to PKI deployment and usage. Since > your company has a product relevant to PKI, we'd like > to ask for a small amount of assistance. > > >>Why is this worth your valuable time? The market for > >>PKI enabled applications is potentially quite large. > >>The U.S. Department of Defense is now deploying > >>PKI enabled smart cards to 4 million workers. > >>Deployment at the FBI is under way and discussions > >>have begun on extending the system throughout the > >>U.S. government. Corporate adoption of PKI enabled > >>smart cards is picking up with large companies > >>like Johnson and Johnson and Sun Microsystems > >>leading the way. > > > >> [Shivangi] - At a global level also, much of Europe and Asia have PKI > > initiatives and E-Signature legislations that directly or indirectly > > propagate PKI > > > > (Sorry - cudnt resist adding a bit of "non-US" centric point in your > > note ;-)) > > Thanks for pointing this out. Maybe we should add a > sentence after "U.S. government" saying "In Europe, > Asia, and around the world, PKI initiatives are under > way and in some cases large and well established." > > >> [Shivangi] - Steve, is this survey targetted at those orgns who > > already have PKI support built in for their products or for those who do > > not currently have support but are "candidates" for the same? If it is > > going to be answered by people who already have some level of support > > built in (thats the impression I got from the list of vendors u've > > circulated), then there shud be a few more questions for them like : > > Some survey recipients already have PKI support in their > products. Many do not. It is a mix. > > > -Are you happy with the PKI functionality/ features built into your > > product? If not, what specific areas would you like to enhance/ improve? > > I like this question. Let's change question 1 to ask > for a bit more information: > > 1) Does your company currently sell products with PKI > support? If so, which products include PKI support > and what sort of PKI support do they include? > > And then add a new question after that: > > 2) Are you happy with your PKI support or lack thereof? > If not, what changes would you like to make? Is there > something in particular holding you back from making > these changes? If so, what? > > > -Are the existing standards in PKI sufficient for building your > > applications? Did you feel constrained at any point in time by the lack > > of/ incompleteness of standards? > > -Did you have to take any decisions to do some amount of "proprietary > > implementation" to overcome lack of a standard specification? Would you > > like to share that with us? > > These questions seem to be gathering more detail > about problems with PKI-related standards. But we > haven't yet determined whether standards are a > serious problem for these companies. I want to > understand what problems are holding them back > before drilling down too much on one problem. > Does that sound good to you? > > > These were some thoughts that came to my mind while going thru > your mail. > > If I have any more bursts of inspiration, will let you know. > > Thanks for these comments. Please let me know > if you are comfortable with the changes I have > suggested to address them. I will submit the > revised survey to the PKI TC tomorrow so they > can discuss it at the Wednesday PKI TC meeting. > > Any ideas on the vendor list? > > Thanks, > > Steve > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]