pki-guidelines message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [pki-guidelines] Potential dates/times for AGSC meeting
- From: "Anders Rundgren" <anders.rundgren@telia.com>
- To: "Steve Hanna" <shanna@juniper.net>,"Arshad Noor" <arshad.noor@strongauth.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:51:45 +0100
Since there are very
few active members in the AGSC I think that it would be of interest to get a call with more people than we
currently seem to gather. As an alternative
we could have a straw poll on in which direction the TPKI is to be headed. A non-exhaustive list of directions
include:
- A full-blown standards effort that would (if
successful) be adopted by the browser vendors
- An on-line signature market research. Who is
using this and for what?
- A research report on what the issues are
about
- Signature product market research
- Research on using browsers "as-is" (no
ActiveX etc) for creating novel signature and encryption schemes
- Publishing other organizations' reports on
their use of on-line signatures
I'm personally already into #1, but can (continue
to) contribute to #2 and #3. #4 is a problem since the
characteristics of most systems are covered by NDAs which limit the
possibilities to publish much else than a list of product + vendor.
Regarding #5, I have tried hard obtaining information on this but all I have got
to date indicates that it doesn't work.
I believe items #2 and #6 would be most
suitable as they are in line with other PKI-TC work, which is more a
PKI promotion and education effort than about detailed descriptions
of technology and solutions.
Anders
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006
18:37
Subject: Re: [pki-guidelines] Potential dates/times
for AGSC meeting
I'll be on vacation that week. But you may
proceed without me if you
like.
Thanks,
Steve
Arshad Noor wrote:
> Due to my
gaffe, only Anders and I were on the call - Anders had to
> call me
directly to get the correct conference number. Once again,
> my
apologies.
>
> We decided to reschedule the meeting. I would
like to propose the
> same time - 9:00am for either Tuesday the 21st,
Wednesday the 22nd
> or Thursday the 23d of February. The conference
call in number and
> the PIN code are the same: (605) 990-0200 and
370529. Please let
> me know which date suits members of the AGSC
best. Thank you.
>
> Arshad Noor
> StrongAuth,
Inc.
>
> Arshad Noor wrote:
>
>> My apologies
everybody - because I live in the California Bay Area,
>> I transposed
the area code of the conference call number; the actual
>> number is
(605) 990-0200 and NOT 650-990-0200. I'm on the line in
>> case
anyone sees this e-mail and joins in.
>>
>>
Arshad
>>
>> Arshad Noor wrote:
>>
>>> I
am tentatively scheduling our conference call for February 9th
>>>
at 9:00am PST. Details are as follows:
>>>
>>>
Date: (February 9,
2006
>>> Start time: 0900 PST, 1200 EST, 1700
GMT
>>> End time: 1000 PST, 1300 EST, 1800
GMT
>>> Call in #: 650-990-0200
>>>
PIN:
370529
>>>
>>>
Agenda: TPKI
goals
>>>
Schedule
>>>
Potential
technology
>>>
Administrative stuff
>>>
>>> If anyone wants to add to
this agenda, please let me know. Thanks.
>>>
>>>
Arshad Noor
>>> StrongAuth, Inc.
>>>
>>>
Arshad Noor wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aaauugh! I knew the
tabs would get messed up!
>>>>
>>>> The roster is
as follows:
>>>>
>>>> 1 VM in US-EST, 1 VM in
US-PST (makes for 2 VM's)
>>>> 1 M in the EU and 1 M in US-PST
(makes for 2 M's)
>>>> 1 O in the EU, US-EST and US-PST each
(makes for 3 O's)
>>>>
>>>> adding up to a total
of 7 members + observers.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry about
that.
>>>>
>>>>
Arshad
>>>>
>>>> Arshad Noor
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It appears that the TPKI
project is generating enough interest
>>>>> to warrant holding
regular meetings. I am, therefore, canvassing
>>>>> for
appropriate dates/times that will work for the
subcommitee
>>>>>
members.
>>>>>
>>>>> I notice that we have
the following demographics from the OASIS
>>>>> AGSC
roster:
>>>>>
>>>>>
EU US-EST US-PST
Total
>>>>>
-- ------ ------
-----
>>>>>
>>>>> Voting
Member
1 1 2
>>>>>
Member
1 1
2
>>>>> Observer
1 1 1
3
>>>>>
-----
>>>>>
7
>>>>>
=====
>>>>>
I'm not sure what the quorum guidelines are,
>>>>> but it
appears
>>>>> that common-sense dictates, both voting members
must be
>>>>> available for an item to be brought to vote, and
that at least
>>>>> 3 of the 4 members (or should it be 4 of 7
members+observers?)
>>>>> should be present to form a
quorum. I will clarify that with
>>>>> the
administrative people at OASIS, but in the meantime,
lets
>>>>> try to find meeting times that work for
us.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would recommend that we
begin meeting starting in February 2006.
>>>>> I propose the
following dates and times; please let me know which
>>>>> ones
work for you on a monthly cycle.
>>>>>
>>>>>
February 07, 2006 09:00am PST, 12:00 Noon EST, 17:00
GMT
>>>>> February 08, 2006 09:00am PST,
12:00 Noon EST, 17:00 GMT
>>>>> February 09,
2006 09:00am PST, 12:00 Noon EST, 17:00
GMT
>>>>>
>>>>> This will give us a chance
to prepare the minutes and report it
>>>>> to the TC meetings
that are held the following
week.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank
you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Arshad
Noor
>>>>> StrongAuth,
Inc.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]