Re: [pki-survey] Next concall for PKI Survey SC

["Evans Paul" <evans_paul@bah.com>]

Title:

Sorry for the delay in replying - I've been attending the NIST PKI Research
Workshop and was without access to either my email or my cell phone while
inside the NIST building.

My only "fixed" appointment for next week at this instant is Wednesday, May
8 10-12 EDT, so Steve's proposed time works for me.

Paul


Steve Hanna wrote:
> Wednesday is *better* for me. Can we have a 60 minute
> meeting at that time? Wednesday, May 8, 12:00 PM EDT,
> 5:00 PM Ireland time, 9:00 AM PDT.
>
> By the way, Peter, what is the right abbreviation for
> Ireland time? And are you 5 hours ahead of EDT? And
> when do you shift to Summer Time (if at all)? Those
> time changes can really mess up meeting schedules.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> Peter Doyle wrote:
> > That time is OK for me too.
> > Peter
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: leahyt@WellsFargo.COM [mailto:leahyt@WellsFargo.COM]
> > Sent: 28 April 2003 17:18
> > To: steve.hanna@sun.com; leahyt@WellsFargo.COM
> > Cc: Peter.Doyle@baltimore.com; pki-survey@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [pki-survey] Next concall for PKI Survey SC
> >
> > Things change every minute around here... My other meeting switched from Wed
> > to thursday.   I therefore not free on thursday, but free on Wed.   Can we
> > do Wed from 9-10 after the OASIS call?  Sorry about the changes.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Hanna [mailto:steve.hanna@sun.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 8:43 AM
> > To: leahyt@WellsFargo.COM
> > Cc: Peter.Doyle@baltimore.com; pki-survey@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: Re: [pki-survey] Next concall for PKI Survey SC
> >
> > I suspect that Peter's times are EDT (East Coast U.S.).
> > My original message used EDT times, as noted in that
> > message.
> >
> > Peter, can you explain what time zone you meant?
> >
> > Since Peter is in Ireland and Terry is in California,
> > I expect that we'll end up choosing a time that is
> > around 12:00 PM EDT (5:00 PM Ireland time, 9:00 AM PDT).
> >
> > Based on the info submitted so far by Terry and Peter,
> > it looks like the best date/time is Thursday, May 8,
> > 12:00 PM EDT, 5:00 PM Ireland time, 9:00 AM PDT.
> >
> > Does that time actually work for everybody? Paul?
> >
> > I only have 30 minutes at that time, but I'll see if
> > I can move my 12:30 PM meeting to make more time.
> > Or maybe Terry could call in 30 minutes earlier.
> >
> > Due to our different time zones, we'll probably
> > always end up squeezed into that same time range
> > (morning PDT, midday EDT, late afternoon Ireland time).
> > I suppose the same will be true for PKI TC concalls.
> > Oh, well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > leahyt@wellsfargo.com wrote:
> > > Wednesday: 10 - 12.30 (PDT) or
> > > Thursday: 9-10, 11.30 - 12.30 (PDT) works.  I am asuuming Peter's time is
> > > West Coast time... though I could be wrong...tks.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Peter Doyle [mailto:Peter.Doyle@baltimore.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 3:31 AM
> > > To: 'Steve Hanna'; pki-survey@lists.oasis-open.org
> > > Subject: RE: [pki-survey] Next concall for PKI Survey SC
> > >
> > > Below an indication of the times that work best for me;
> > >
> > > Wednesday, May 7: 8:00 AM - 12:30 PM
> > > Thursday, May 8:  8:00 AM - 12:30 PM
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > >
> > >     
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > > The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended
> > > for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message in error or
> > > there are any problems please notify the originator immediately.  The
> > > unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is
> > > strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for
> > > direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration
> > > of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any
> > > virus being passed on.
> > >
> > > This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept for Content
> > > Security threats, including computer viruses.
> > > http://www.baltimore.com
> > >     
> >