OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

pki-survey message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [pki-survey] Survey analysis

The last couple of days have been more chaotic than normal.  One of our 
clients has experienced serious budget issues and has to issue a stop 
work order.  The impact has been that we have a ton of deliverables to 
push out the door by this evening.  The upshot is that I will not be 
able to complete my task by the end of the day.  I will have plenty of 
time Monday to work that an other items as necessary.



Peter Doyle wrote:

>Attached is a draft "nicely formatted report with charts and graphs" (same
>doc in Word and PDF formats).
>I have included respondent quotes but have not had time to analyze the
>correlation of these comments to each respondent's experience.
>Neither have I had time to complete the Conclusions section in the draft
>report; Steve/Paul/Terry - can one of you address this next week as part of
>your review and preparation of a final doc to go to the TC on 11 July?
>I am out of the office now (partly on holidays) till 14 July so cannot help
>any further but hopefully have taken it a long way for you to now finish
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Steve Hanna [mailto:steve.hanna@sun.com]
>Sent: 27 June 2003 23:06
>To: PKI TC Survey SC
>Subject: [pki-survey] Survey analysis
>Paul's estimate of the time required to analyze the
>survey results was better than mine. I just spent
>about two and a half hours analyzing the demographics.
>Oh, well! Here is a PDF file that includes that analysis.
>I noticed a few minor glitches in Paul's analysis.
>For instance, the number responding "Not an Obstacle"
>for "Too Much Legal Work Required" should be 22%. This
>means that the number not responding to that obstacle
>is not 17% as we thought, but a more normal 4%.
>I did not have time to look for correlations between
>the demographics and the obstacles or uses. I will do
>that when I return July 8 (or someone else can do it
>before then, if they like). Sorry! I have attached a
>copy of my spreadsheets with demographics included
>(in StarOffice and Excel formats), in case someone
>else wants to tackle the correlation issue.
>I also didn't have time to write up the minutes
>from today's concall. The gist of it was that we
>reviewed the results of the survey and found them
>informative and somewhat illuminating, if not
>surprising. We agreed on specific action items
>(listed below) that will allow us to promptly
>write up a detailed analysis of the survey.
>We agreed that a follow-up survey will be required
>in order to better understand the primary obstacles
>and determine the best ways to address them. We want
>to conduct this survey July 15-August 15 so that we
>can have the results by the end of August and kick
>off September with a PKI TC meeting (maybe face-to-face)
>on ways to address these obstacles. We also want to have
>EEMA and others get involved with reviewing and commenting
>on our survey analysis.
>We agreed that we will focus first on writing up
>an analysis of the survey results, aiming to have
>that completed and sent to the PKI TC by July 11.
>We will ask the PKI TC to review the analysis and
>get us comments ASAP. We will also suggest to them
>the plan of action outlined above and ask for their
>comments on or approval of this plan. We will also
>ask them to approve distributing the analysis to
>the survey respondents.
>Action Items for Survey Analysis
>1) Analyze demographics (Steve, due June 27)
>2) Look for strong correlations between demographics
>   and obstacles or uses (Steve, due June 27)
>3) See if results change when inexperienced respondents
>   are removed (Paul, due July 3?)
>4) Analyze textual responses, relate to experience
>   and/or involvement (Peter, due July 4)
>5) Analyze respondents who supplied email addresses
>   to see if they are representative of the respondents
>   as a whole (Steve, due July 9)
>6) Prepare a nicely formatted report with charts and
>   graphs (Peter, first draft due July 4)
>7) Review and revise report as needed (Paul and Steve,
>   due July 11)
>The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended
>for the addressee(s) only.  If you have received this message in error or
>there are any problems please notify the originator immediately.  The 
>unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is 
>strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for
>direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration
>of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any 
>virus being passed on.
>This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept for Content
>Security threats, including computer viruses.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]