[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [pki-survey] Survey analysis
The last couple of days have been more chaotic than normal. One of our clients has experienced serious budget issues and has to issue a stop work order. The impact has been that we have a ton of deliverables to push out the door by this evening. The upshot is that I will not be able to complete my task by the end of the day. I will have plenty of time Monday to work that an other items as necessary. Regards, Paul Peter Doyle wrote: >Attached is a draft "nicely formatted report with charts and graphs" (same >doc in Word and PDF formats). > >I have included respondent quotes but have not had time to analyze the >correlation of these comments to each respondent's experience. >Neither have I had time to complete the Conclusions section in the draft >report; Steve/Paul/Terry - can one of you address this next week as part of >your review and preparation of a final doc to go to the TC on 11 July? > >I am out of the office now (partly on holidays) till 14 July so cannot help >any further but hopefully have taken it a long way for you to now finish >off. > >Regards, >Peter > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Steve Hanna [mailto:steve.hanna@sun.com] >Sent: 27 June 2003 23:06 >To: PKI TC Survey SC >Subject: [pki-survey] Survey analysis > > >Paul's estimate of the time required to analyze the >survey results was better than mine. I just spent >about two and a half hours analyzing the demographics. >Oh, well! Here is a PDF file that includes that analysis. > >I noticed a few minor glitches in Paul's analysis. >For instance, the number responding "Not an Obstacle" >for "Too Much Legal Work Required" should be 22%. This >means that the number not responding to that obstacle >is not 17% as we thought, but a more normal 4%. > >I did not have time to look for correlations between >the demographics and the obstacles or uses. I will do >that when I return July 8 (or someone else can do it >before then, if they like). Sorry! I have attached a >copy of my spreadsheets with demographics included >(in StarOffice and Excel formats), in case someone >else wants to tackle the correlation issue. > >I also didn't have time to write up the minutes >from today's concall. The gist of it was that we >reviewed the results of the survey and found them >informative and somewhat illuminating, if not >surprising. We agreed on specific action items >(listed below) that will allow us to promptly >write up a detailed analysis of the survey. > >We agreed that a follow-up survey will be required >in order to better understand the primary obstacles >and determine the best ways to address them. We want >to conduct this survey July 15-August 15 so that we >can have the results by the end of August and kick >off September with a PKI TC meeting (maybe face-to-face) >on ways to address these obstacles. We also want to have >EEMA and others get involved with reviewing and commenting >on our survey analysis. > >We agreed that we will focus first on writing up >an analysis of the survey results, aiming to have >that completed and sent to the PKI TC by July 11. >We will ask the PKI TC to review the analysis and >get us comments ASAP. We will also suggest to them >the plan of action outlined above and ask for their >comments on or approval of this plan. We will also >ask them to approve distributing the analysis to >the survey respondents. > >Action Items for Survey Analysis >-------------------------------- > >1) Analyze demographics (Steve, due June 27) >2) Look for strong correlations between demographics > and obstacles or uses (Steve, due June 27) >3) See if results change when inexperienced respondents > are removed (Paul, due July 3?) >4) Analyze textual responses, relate to experience > and/or involvement (Peter, due July 4) >5) Analyze respondents who supplied email addresses > to see if they are representative of the respondents > as a whole (Steve, due July 9) >6) Prepare a nicely formatted report with charts and > graphs (Peter, first draft due July 4) >7) Review and revise report as needed (Paul and Steve, > due July 11) > >Thanks, > >Steve > > > >----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended >for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or >there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The >unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is >strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for >direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration >of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any >virus being passed on. > >This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept for Content >Security threats, including computer viruses. >http://www.baltimore.com > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]