[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [pki-survey] Survey analysis
What do you know? I have been working on the report for two days now and I *still* have more to do! Tomorrow, I really should have something ready for review. But I can't work on this any more today. Sorry, Steve Steve Hanna wrote: > > Thanks, Peter. This looks like a great start! > > I'll work on analyzing textual comments and > correlations, adding conclusions, and putting > on finishing touches. I should have a draft for > Paul and Terry to review tomorrow. > > If Paul and/or Terry get me comments promptly, > we can send a draft to the PKI TC on Friday for > them to review before our PKI TC meeting the > following Wednesday. > > Thanks for your work, > > Steve > > Peter Doyle wrote: > > > > Attached is a draft "nicely formatted report with charts and graphs" (same > > doc in Word and PDF formats). > > > > I have included respondent quotes but have not had time to analyze the > > correlation of these comments to each respondent's experience. > > Neither have I had time to complete the Conclusions section in the draft > > report; Steve/Paul/Terry - can one of you address this next week as part of > > your review and preparation of a final doc to go to the TC on 11 July? > > > > I am out of the office now (partly on holidays) till 14 July so cannot help > > any further but hopefully have taken it a long way for you to now finish > > off. > > > > Regards, > > Peter > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Steve Hanna [mailto:steve.hanna@sun.com] > > Sent: 27 June 2003 23:06 > > To: PKI TC Survey SC > > Subject: [pki-survey] Survey analysis > > > > Paul's estimate of the time required to analyze the > > survey results was better than mine. I just spent > > about two and a half hours analyzing the demographics. > > Oh, well! Here is a PDF file that includes that analysis. > > > > I noticed a few minor glitches in Paul's analysis. > > For instance, the number responding "Not an Obstacle" > > for "Too Much Legal Work Required" should be 22%. This > > means that the number not responding to that obstacle > > is not 17% as we thought, but a more normal 4%. > > > > I did not have time to look for correlations between > > the demographics and the obstacles or uses. I will do > > that when I return July 8 (or someone else can do it > > before then, if they like). Sorry! I have attached a > > copy of my spreadsheets with demographics included > > (in StarOffice and Excel formats), in case someone > > else wants to tackle the correlation issue. > > > > I also didn't have time to write up the minutes > > from today's concall. The gist of it was that we > > reviewed the results of the survey and found them > > informative and somewhat illuminating, if not > > surprising. We agreed on specific action items > > (listed below) that will allow us to promptly > > write up a detailed analysis of the survey. > > > > We agreed that a follow-up survey will be required > > in order to better understand the primary obstacles > > and determine the best ways to address them. We want > > to conduct this survey July 15-August 15 so that we > > can have the results by the end of August and kick > > off September with a PKI TC meeting (maybe face-to-face) > > on ways to address these obstacles. We also want to have > > EEMA and others get involved with reviewing and commenting > > on our survey analysis. > > > > We agreed that we will focus first on writing up > > an analysis of the survey results, aiming to have > > that completed and sent to the PKI TC by July 11. > > We will ask the PKI TC to review the analysis and > > get us comments ASAP. We will also suggest to them > > the plan of action outlined above and ask for their > > comments on or approval of this plan. We will also > > ask them to approve distributing the analysis to > > the survey respondents. > > > > Action Items for Survey Analysis > > -------------------------------- > > > > 1) Analyze demographics (Steve, due June 27) > > 2) Look for strong correlations between demographics > > and obstacles or uses (Steve, due June 27) > > 3) See if results change when inexperienced respondents > > are removed (Paul, due July 3?) > > 4) Analyze textual responses, relate to experience > > and/or involvement (Peter, due July 4) > > 5) Analyze respondents who supplied email addresses > > to see if they are representative of the respondents > > as a whole (Steve, due July 9) > > 6) Prepare a nicely formatted report with charts and > > graphs (Peter, first draft due July 4) > > 7) Review and revise report as needed (Paul and Steve, > > due July 11) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Steve > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The information contained in this message is confidential and is intended > > for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message in error or > > there are any problems please notify the originator immediately. The > > unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or alteration of this message is > > strictly forbidden. Baltimore Technologies plc will not be liable for > > direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising from alteration > > of the contents of this message by a third party or as a result of any > > virus being passed on. > > > > This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept for Content > > Security threats, including computer viruses. > > http://www.baltimore.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Name: Survey Prelim Report.doc > > Survey Prelim Report.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword) > > Encoding: base64 > > > > Name: Survey Prelim Report.pdf > > Survey Prelim Report.pdf Type: Acrobat (application/pdf) > > Encoding: base64
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]