RE: [plcs-dex] Capability/Dex structuring

["Rob Bodington" <rob.bodington@eurostep.com>]

In effect that is what you are doing when saying that a capability is dependent
on another capability

E.g. From representing _activity

<!-- capabilities that this capability is dependent on. 
      I.e. must be included in any DEX that uses this capability -->
 <dependent_capabilities>
   <related_capability id="assigning_date_time"/>
   <related_capability id="referencing_documents"/>
   <related_capability id="assigning_identifiers"/>
   <related_capability id="assigning_reference_data"/>
   <related_capability id="referencing_product_as_realized"/>
   <related_capability id="representing_person_organization"/>
   <related_capability id="assigning_product_properties"/>
   <related_capability id="assigning_process_properties"/>
   <related_capability id="representing_properties_numerically"/>
   <related_capability id="representing_properties_textually"/>
   <related_capability id="representing_justification"/>
 </dependent_capabilities>

Regards
Rob

-------------------------------------------   
Rob Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Web Page: http://www.eurostep.com http://www.share-a-space.com
Email: Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Phone: +44 (0)1454 270030
Mobile: +44 (0)7796 176 401



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim [mailto:timturner11@bellsouth.net]
> Sent: 03 June 2004 16:00
> To: plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [plcs-dex] Capability/Dex structuring
> 
> 
> A quick question to the wise.
> 
> We have defined Dexs to be collections of capabilities. Is it also possible
> that a capability can be a collection of other capabilities?
> 
> Regards,
> Tim