[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: SV: Alternative representation of Parts List
All Appologies !! I ment to send a zipped file ! Regards Leif > -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- > Från: Gyllström Leif > Skickat: den 7 mars 2005 13:13 > Till: 'plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org' > Ämne: Alternative representation of Parts List > > Hi > > At the Lillehammer meeting we had a lot of discussions regarding Parts List, and whether it > should be a separate DEX, or a capability, or .... However, I think we concluded on that. > > However, I still think there is a practical issue that we have to resolve and that is HOW > a Parts List should be represented in a data exchange based the PLCS data model. > My concern does not just adress the Parts List issue, but practically any other exchange > of documented results such as a FMECA analysis report, a Maintenance plan etc etc. > > In the attached document I've provided four different approaches on HOW a documented > result (e.g. Parts List) could be represented in a data exchange. (And there might be more) > > I think we have to conclude on one approach which will be generic enough to cater > for any type of documented result. > > Any thoughts ?? > > It might even be a combination of the four approached that would be the best solution > such as a combination of #1 and #4. > > Regrads > > Leif Gyllström > > > <<Fil: Four alternatives for Part List representation.doc>> > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]