Issue against Product_breakdown_for_support

["Barker, Sean (UK)" <sean.barker@baesystems.com>]

	<issue id="SB/LG-DEX3-2" type="general"
category="minor_technical" by="sean barker" date="2005-09-19"
status="open">
		<description>
Requirement from DEX 3 transferred:Need to classify part with
part-replacement-indicator: Mandatory, conditional. [Meaning, if the
part occurs in a disassembly, then it must be replaced / should be
replaced on condition. Disassembly-replacement-indicator might be a
better term.]
We believe this is a classification of the usage of the item in the
context of the end-product next higher assembly, or possibly of a
particular part in the general context of the end-product.
</description>
	</issue>

END USERS: Is there any additional requirement to apply this
classification in the context of specific tasks? I.e. are there cases
where a particular task is such that executing forces the replacement of
the part whereas this is not true in general.

Sean Barker
0117 302 8184


********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************