Idenitfying unknown versions

I have just raised this issue against

Template: representing_product_as_realized

Template: representing_part

<issue

id="RBN-1"

type="general"

status="open"

category="minor_technical"

by="Rob Bodington"

date="07-04-11">

There are many businesses where a part or product_as_realized is never

versioned, or in at exchange, the version is either, not known, or is not

significant, i.e. any version will do as the fit form and function remain

the same across versions. However, the templates for representing the part

and product_as_realized enforce an identification of a version.

I think that we should have a convention for identifying an unkown version

and this should be documented in these templates

</description>

</issue>

Regards
Rob

-------------------------------------------
Rob Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Web Page: http://www.eurostep.com http://www.share-a-space.com
Email: Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Phone: +44 (0)1452 810 960
Mobile: +44 (0)7796 176 401
Skype: rbodington

This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of Eurostep Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.

plcs-dex message