[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [plcs-dex] dexlib\data\templates\representing_promissory_usage\dvlp\issues.xml
Some responses to your commentsIssue: RBN-1 by Rob Bodington (07-04-03) minor_technical issue Why is it mandatory to classify the assembly relationship? Comment: (Peter
Bergström 2007-04-18) Comment: (Tim
Turner 2007-08-8) Comment: (Rob
Bodington 07-08-09) Issue: RBN-2 by Rob Bodington (07-06-25) minor_technical issue representing_promissory usage and representing_assembly should use the same approach to representing the quantity. The quantity should be represented by a representing_quantity template rather than a representing_count. This will allow quantities with units. E.g. 10 litres to be represented as well as counts. Comment: (Rob
Bodington 07-07-06) Comment: (Tim
Turner 2007-08-8) Comment: (Rob
Bodington 07-08-09)
Regards From:
Tim Turner [mailto:tjt@lsc.co.uk]
I have just added the following minor technical comments to representing_promissory_usage template.
RBN-1 (Re:removal of classification of the assembly relationship). I disagree. It is useful to distinguish between other types of usages of promissory usage. E.g. I might wish to define it as a BOM view, an APL, etc.. Also, given that the structure is identical to representing_assembly, it would be useful to separate the types of relationship by their use context. This is why there is a relation_type attribute on view_definition_relationship.
RBN-2 (Re:changing from representing_count to representing_quantity). Representing_quantity allows bad practice in this context. The original count used to represent quantity restricted the usage with respect to the item in the assembly to the number of occurrences in the assembly or to allow for a quantified BOM. It is not practical to allow a quantity such as 0.5 Kg of Parts within an assembly.
New minor technical Issue TJT-1 The characterization shown in Fig5 does not match with those described in the section. Either modify the figure or update the characterizations provided.
DISCLAIMER: ***SECURITY LABEL: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED*** The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. This e-mail originates from LSC Group. Registered in England & Wales No 2275471 Registered Office: Devonport Royal Dockyard, Devonport, Plymouth, PL1 4SG
DISCLAIMER: ***SECURITY LABEL: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED*** The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. This e-mail originates from LSC Group Ltd. Registered in England & Wales No 2275471 Registered Office: Devonport Royal Dockyard, Devonport, Plymouth, PL1 4SG, having a place of business at Lincoln House, Wellington Crescent, Fradley Park, Lichfield, Staffordshire WS13 8RZ and at Catherine House, 40a St Thomas Street, Weymouth, Dorset DE4 8EH. VAT number: GB 655 1330 55 |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]