RE: [plcs-tog] OASIS PLCS TC concept model

["Tor Arne Irgens" <tai@sfk.mil.no>]

Concur with Mats.
There are a lot of good comments so far and I believe this discussion is
very fruitful in ensuring ONE COMMON understanding of the
terms/constructs/words/xxx/uuyyu/etc.

As Nigel suggests we need to refine some of the details in additional
slideshows. 

A color key would be nice. 
Maybe the purpose is to show by color what is at ISO level, at OASIS level
and on BUSINESS level to decide?
Or a separate color for the standardized stuff, one for under development?
Or one color for tools?
Or???


Even though not all the comments so far can be reflected in the end product,
I find it difficult to disagree with any of the comments. 

I suggest we let it run for another week, before trying to bring it all
together.

Do we have the entire set of constructs we need in the model by now, or is
something still missing?


Best regards 
  
Tor Arne 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: mats.nilsson@fmv.se [mailto:mats.nilsson@fmv.se] 
Sent: 13. oktober 2005 10:28
To: plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [plcs-tog] OASIS PLCS TC concept model

Tim and all others,

As I se it, the main purpose of the Concept Model is to define the terms we
use to express different concepts among out selves and to a future external
audience.

It first came from the need to clarify the difference between a DEX
Specification and a DEX file because the term 'DEX' was used for both! The
use of 'Business Concept' was also unclear... 

I think it will help us all lot in the future if we complete and agree on
this model, and then add new terms/concepts to it as we make them up.

Regards,
  Mats - FMV