From: Gibson,
Martin [mailto:ils-de@a.dii.mod.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 3:13
AM
To: 'mats.nilsson@fmv.se';
rob.bodington@eurostep.com
Cc:
plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [plcs-tog] RE: Documents from
the TOG meeting
-----Original
Message-----
From:
mats.nilsson@fmv.se [mailto:mats.nilsson@fmv.se]
Sent: 14 December 2005 08:05
To: ils-de@a.dii.mod.uk;
rob.bodington@eurostep.com
Cc:
plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [plcs-tog] RE: Documents
from the TOG meeting
Another question: If
I want to use the non-abbreviated term for 'DEX'. Should I
then pronounce/write it "Data exchange set" (which for my swedish
ears much sounds like file (file = a 'set' of data)) or "Data exchange
specification"?
Regards -
Mats
Martin,
Thanks for the
clarification!
I'm ok with that. As
long as everyone understands eachother! 'DEX' and 'DEX file' it
is!
Regards,
Mats
- - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mats Nilsson,
FMV
Från:
Gibson, Martin [mailto:ils-de@a.dii.mod.uk]
Skickat: den 7 december 2005
11:33
Till: Nilsson, Mats
maxnn
Ämne: RE: [plcs-tog]
RE: Documents from the TOG meeting
Hope you enjoyed
yesterday's telecon/meeting (as much as I did!).
I'm not sure it was
mentioned within the telecon, but , you are correct in your guess that the ToG
Agreed that the term 'DEX' is synonymous with the term 'DEX Specification' and
that a 'DEX file' is indeed that file which would be exchanged as part of
a PLCS implementation.
-----Original
Message-----
From:
mats.nilsson@fmv.se [mailto:mats.nilsson@fmv.se]
Sent: 06 December 2005 08:13
To: rob.bodington@eurostep.com;
plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: SV: [plcs-tog] RE: Documents
from the TOG meeting
All,
Is the visio
diagram a result of the review of the concept model
draft?
It lacks some of the terms in the concept model
(DEX file,
Requirements, etc.) and it refers to 'DEX Specifications' as 'DEXs'.
I did not attend
the meeting. Is this what was agreed?
I like the
graphical layout though (except for the 'uses' arrow pointing to 'Business
Reference Data' that has no source...).
Should I put it in
the DEXlib information pages (new name for the help section...) and in that
way prepare it for ballot?!
Maybe something for
the meeting this afternoon?
Regards,
Mats
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mats
Nilsson, FMV
Från: Rob Bodington
[mailto:rob.bodington@eurostep.com]
Skickat: den 6 december 2005
08:00
Till:
plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org
Kopia: Sean Barker
Ämne: [plcs-tog] RE: Documents from the
TOG meeting
Hi
I have had several
requests for a non Visio version of the diagram.
-----Original
Message-----
From: Rob
Bodington [mailto:rob.bodington@eurostep.com]
Sent: 30 November 2005
14:12
To:
'plcs-tog@lists.oasis-open.org'
Cc: Sean Barker
(Sean.Barker@baesystems.com)
Subject: Documents from the TOG
meeting
Hi
Here are the
diagrams/spreadsheets that we developed in the TOG.
We went through all DEXs (apart
from 5 and 9) and identified which capabilities were required. We then
looked at who as editing it and whether they were funded. The spreadsheet
reflects results of this.
We also reviewed the concept
model and produced the attached Visio diagram.
Regards
Rob
-------------------------------------------
Rob
Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Web Page: http://www.eurostep.com http://www.share-a-space.com
Email:
Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Phone: +44 (0)1454 270030
Mobile: +44
(0)7796 176 401