OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

plcs-tog message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: 242 / PLCS PSM harmonization


Hi

Subsequent to the TC meeting at Rolls Royce and the TC freezing of the PLCS PSM,  AP242 have reviewed the proposed harmonized model (which has been incorporated in the PLCS PSM and frozen) and have raised a number of issues.

 

I have attached the slides that outline their main issues.

I realize that we have frozen the PSM and intend to consider the other harmonization changes at some stage in the future, however,

as these issues are against identification and descriptions, adopting the change at a later date once we have a lot more DEXs and templates developed will have a major impact.

 

Consequently, I would like to set up a TOG call  next week to discuss the impact and seek a TOG decision as to the best way forward.

I have setup a doodle poll to see when would be the best time:

http://www.doodle.com/b54s2zye9uhyssm4

 

As well as the id and description issues, they have also identified issues against ProductViewDefinition and ViewDefnitionContext.

These are not big changes.

 

 

For ProductViewDefinition they want to have initialContext and additionalContexts that were in the Modules.

The PSM changed this contexts. Not a big change IMHO

 

ENTITY ProductViewDefinition

   SUPERTYPE OF (ONEOF (PartViewDefinition, ProductAsIndividualView));

  id : OPTIONAL IdentifierSelect;

  classifiedAs: OPTIONAL SET[1:?] OF ClassSelect;

  sameAs : OPTIONAL SET[1:?] OF ProxySelect;

  (* PLCS PSM approach contexts : SET[1:?] OF ViewDefinitionContextSelect; *)

  initialContext : ViewDefinitionContext (* ViewDefinitionContextSelect *) ;

  additionalContexts : OPTIONAL SET[1:?] OF ViewDefinitionContext (* ViewDefinitionContextSelect *) ;

(*

INVERSE

  ofVersion : ProductVersion FOR viewDefinitions;

*)

END_ENTITY;

 

 

For ViewDefinitionContext they would like:

Again – not a bug change

 

TYPE ApplicationDomainType = STRING;

END_TYPE;

 

TYPE LifeCycleStageType = STRING;

END_TYPE;

 

TYPE ApplicationDomainSelect = SELECT(ApplicationDomainType, ApplicationDomain);

END_TYPE;

 

TYPE LifeCycleStageSelect = SELECT(LifeCycleStageType, LifeCycleStage);

END_TYPE;

     

 

ENTITY ViewDefinitionContext;

  applicationDomain : ApplicationDomainSelect;

  description : OPTIONAL DescriptorSelect;

  lifeCycleStage : LifeCycleStageSelect;

UNIQUE

  UR1: applicationDomain, lifeCycleStage;

END_ENTITY;

 

ENTITY ApplicationDomain;

  sameAs : SET[1:?] OF ProxySelect;

UNIQUE

  UR1: sameAs;

END_ENTITY;

 

ENTITY LifeCycleStage;

  sameAs : SET[1:?] OF ProxySelect;

UNIQUE

  UR1: sameAs;

END_ENTITY;

 

 

They have also raised issues against Part

 

I realize that  we have agreed to freeze the PSM based on the recent changes.

The changes that they are proposing are to identification and so

 

Regards
Rob

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Rob Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Web Page:
http://www.eurostep.com
Email: Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Phone: +44 (0)1452 810 960
Mobile: +44 (0)7796 176 401
Skype: rbodington

Eurostep Limited. Registered in England and Wales No.03049099

Registered Office: Cwttir Lane, St. Asaph, Denbighshire LL17 0LQ.

 

Attachment: id, name & description requ v0.4.ppt
Description: id, name & description requ v0.4.ppt



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]