OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

plcs message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Groups - PLCS Meeting 44 Teleconference modified



PLCS Meeting 44 Teleconference has been modified by Mr. Christopher Kreiler

Date:  Monday, 06 April 2009
Time:  02:00pm - 03:30pm GMT

Event Description:
Meeting 44  Teleconference - 6 April 2009 - 1600 CET, 1500 UK, 1400 GMT, 1000 US Eastern, and 0700 US Pacific Time - for maximum 90 minutes.  

Dial-in numbers & passcodes:

PARTICIPANTS PIN NUMBER:      499596 #

  
Country	Number
Austria	0800 999 808
Belgium	0800 48736
France	0805 110 496
Germany	0800 101 4935
Ireland	1800 992 217
Italy	800 985 528
Spain	900 998 979
Sweden	0200 895 376
Switzerland	0800 000 385
USA	1866 874 0924
UK Free Call	0800 694 0271
UK Local Call	0845 144 0023
Std Int Dial In	+44 (0) 1452 542 437

Agenda:
OASIS Product Life Cycle Support Technical Committee 

Meeting 44  Teleconference  6 April 2009 - 1600 CET, 1500 UK, 1400 GMT, 1000 US Eastern, and 0700 US Pacific Time - for maximum 90 minutes.  

Dial-in numbers & passcodes:

PARTICIPANTS PIN NUMBER:      499596 #

  
Country	Number
Austria	0800 999 808
Belgium	0800 48736
France	0805 110 496
Germany	0800 101 4935
Ireland	1800 992 217
Italy	800 985 528
Spain	900 998 979
Sweden	0200 895 376
Switzerland	0800 000 385
USA	1866 874 0924
UK Free Call	0800 694 0271
UK Local Call	0845 144 0023
Std Int Dial In	+44 (0) 1452 542 437

Objective

The principal objectives of this session will be to update the TC members on progress with the active tasks in Phase 2 of the DEX activity, and continuing efforts to identify new resources to address the unassigned tasks.  Members will be invited to highlight new DEX development projects.  Other agenda items will be covered as time permits.

1.	Welcome by Chair


2.	Roll call 


 
3.	Report of Technical Oversight Group (Tor Arne Irgens) 
	Report of TOG telecons
Action item 38/1: The TOG Chair is invited to reform the TOG with an additional focus on harmonization (Tor Arne Irgens - completed)
	Purpose of TOG
	Recommendations
	Membership
	Report of activities on PLCS Information Pages
4.	Report on second phase (Howard Mason)
	Review of resource commitments
See revised spreadsheet for breakdown of tasks and commitments.  (Phase_II_v8.xls) (http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/plcs/download.php/29624/Phase_II_v8.xls)
	Implementers Forum
Action item 37/2: Pull together the revised proposal for the implementers forum for discussion for the next telecom. (Howard Mason and Nils Sandsmark) 
	New DEX proposals (Standing Action item 37/5)
Action item 39/3: UK MOD to summarize DEXs under development for posting on OASIS website (UK MOD)
	TDP proposal update (N.Figay)
Action item 41/2: Members interested in developing the Airbus TDP DEX are requested to contact Melanie Baudisch at EADS MAS +49 84 59 81 78 943 melanie.baudisch@eads.com (All)
5.	Ballot comment resolution of first DEX package  (Bryant Allen)
	Aviation Maintenance DEX
	Task DEX
Action item 41/3: CORE Team members are requested to work with Bryant Allen and Trine Hansen to resolve comments (CORE Team)
For information - from Clause 3.2 of the TC procedures
Before the TC can approve its Committee Draft as a Committee Specification the TC must conduct a public review of the work. The decision by the TC to submit the specification for public review requires a Full Majority Vote, and must be accompanied by a recommendation from the TC of external stakeholders who should be notified of the review. The Committee Draft approved to go to review shall be called a Public Review Draft. The public review must be announced by the TC Administrator to the OASIS Membership list and optionally on other public mail lists; the TC Administrator shall at the same time issue a call for IPR disclosure.
Comments from non-TC Members must be collected via the TCs archived public comment facility; comments made through any other means shall not be accepted. The TC must acknowledge the receipt of each comment, track the comments received, and publish to its primary e-mail list the disposition of each comment at the end of the review period.
No changes may be made to the Public Review Draft during a review. If changes are required the specification must be withdrawn from review then resubmitted.
The TC may conduct any number of review cycles (i.e. approval to send a Committee Draft to Public Review, collecting comments, making edits to the specification, etc.). The first public review of a specification must take place for a minimum of 60 days, and any subsequent reviews must be held for a minimum of 15 days. Changes made to a specification after a review must be clearly identified in any subsequent review, and the subsequent review shall be limited in scope to changes made in the previous review. Before starting another review cycle the specification must be re-approved as a Committee Draft and then approved to go to public review by the TC.
If Substantive Changes are made to the specification after the public review, whether as a result of public review comments or from TC Member input, then the TC must conduct another review cycle. The specification may not be considered for approval by the TC as a Committee Specification until it has undergone a review cycle during which it has received no comments that result in Substantive Changes to the specification.
6.	Reference data (Mats Nilsson) 
	Report of activities on PLCS Reference Data
Action item 41/4: Reference data library project review ballot comments for project applicability and send out historical documents for review and comment (Mats Nilsson)
7.	AP239 ed 2 (Phil Rutland / Rob Bodington) 
	Report of activities on PLCS AP 239 ed 2
	Resources for supporting the ballot/resolution activities
Action item 41/1: Members interested in assisting with AP239ed2 development are requested to contact Phil Rutland (UKMOD) at phil.rutland517@mod.uk (All)
8.	PLCS Web Services Report (Rob Bodington)
Publication of PLCS Web Services as an OASIS standard - review of new draft
Action item 27/4: Establish contact with OASIS Web Services TC and make PLCS Web Services visible within OASIS (Howard Mason, Rob Bodington, and Nigel Shaw)
Action item 27/5: Review and comment on the level of granularity for PLCS Web Services (All)
Action item 27/6: Determine publication method for PLCS Web Services (Chair, Rob Bodington)
Action item 42/2: Check on next release date for PLCS Web Services (Nigel Shaw)
 
9.	Feedback from Implementations
Action item 33/2: Members are requested to develop a one-page information sheet on their implementation projects for posting on the OASIS PLCS TC website (All)
Members are invited to present recent pilot activities. 
	Feedback on PLCS success stories. 
	Tangible business benefits. 
	Issues and requirements
a)	Norwegian Deployment
b)	Swedish activities
c)	UKMoD LCIA and CBIS
d)	LOGSA
e)	AIA Engineering Data Interoperability Project
f)	ASD - AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe

10.	Promotional activities
Action item 42/4: Send list of events and dates to Secretariat for posting on OASIS website. (All)
	Outreach
o	Future events
	ASD 4000M Procedure handbook for the capture of Maintenance for Military Aircraft  (Draft for decision by CPSC - intended to be validated on A400M project) 
	2009-05-04/08 Reference Data meeting Painswick, UK
	2009-05-17/20 The Collaboration & Interoperability Conference (http://www.3dcic.com/) Estes Park, Colorado USA.  PLCS and PLM is one of the breakout sessions.
	2009-05-17/22 ISO/TC 184/SC 4 57th Plenary, Parksville, British Columbia, Canada

o	www.et.gov - (waiting DEX availability)
Action 19/8: Nigel Shaw to look into the types of XML schemas being covered by et.gov, and provide feedback on whether the OASIS PLCS TC should offer material to et.gov. (Nigel Shaw)
Action 22/12: Recheck to see if posting material and a link to the PLCS ePortal would be beneficial. (Nigel Shaw)

o	 Presentations and General Information folder

	Marketing Links
Action 15/20: Chair (Howard Mason) to check with OASIS, James Clark, to see if list of organizations that provide PLCS services can be done

11.	Liaisons
	SC4 (Tim King)
Action item 37/7: SC4 experts to monitor impact of cross AP implementation project.
	Other OASIS TCs
o	Codelist (Nigel Shaw)
Action 26/1: Continue to track activities of OASIS Codelist TC for impact on reference data requirements (Nigel Shaw) 
	ASD (Carl Wilen/Howard Mason)
	POSC/CAESAR (Nils Sandsmark)
	GEIA (Bryant Allen) 
	Life Cycle Information Management AC/327  (Tor Arne Irgens)
	MoU between PLCS, SCORM, and S1000D

12.	OASIS Administration
	Web site
Members were invited to comment on any issues related to the web site

13.	Future meeting schedule, hosts

14.	Any Other Business

15.	Open Action Items
Meeting Date and Number	Action Item #	Action Item	Responsibility	Closed
14 Apr 2005	15	20	Chair(Howard Mason) to check with OASIS, James Clark, to see if list of organizations that provide PLCS services can be done	Howard Mason	OPEN
					
29 Sep 2005	19	8	Nigel Shaw to look into the types of XML schemas being covered by et.gov, and given the changing state of P28e2, provide feedback on whether the OASIS PLCS TC should offer material to et.gov.	Nigel Shaw	Awaiting first DEX
					
10 Jan 2006	22	12	Recheck to see if posting material and a link to the PLCS ePortal would be beneficial	Nigel Shaw	Awaiting first DEX
					
7 Sep 2006	26	1	Continue to track activities of OASIS Codelist TC for impact on reference data requirements	Nigel Shaw	OPEN
					
31 Oct 2006	27	4	Establish contact with OASIS Web Services TC and make PLCS Web Services visible within OASIS	Howard Mason
Rob Bodington
Nigel Shaw	OPEN
31 Oct 2006	27	5	Review and comment on the level of granularity for PLCS Web Services	All	OPEN
31 Oct 2006	27	6	Determine publication method for PLCS Web Services	Howard Mason
Rob Bodington	OPEN
					
30 Aug 2007	33	2	Members are requested to develop a one-page information sheet on their implementation projects for posting on the OASIS PLCS TC website	All	STANDING ACTION
					
11 Mar 2008	37	2	Pull together the revised proposal for the implementers forum for discussion for the next telecom. 	Howard Mason Nils Sandsmark	OPEN
11 Mar 2008	37	5	Document DEX development proposals	All	STANDING ACTION
11 Mar 2008	37	7	SC4 experts to monitor impact of cross AP implementation project.	SC4 Experts	OPEN
					
25 Jun 2008	39	3	LOGSA and UK MOD to summarize DEXs under development for posting on OASIS website	UK MOD	OPEN
					
					
23 Oct 2008	41	1	Members interested in assisting with AP239ed2 development are requested to contact Phil Rutland (UKMOD) at phil.rutland517@mod.uk
All	OPEN
23 Oct 2008	41	2	Members interested in developing the Airbus TDP DEX are requested to contact Melanie Baudisch at EADS MAS +49 84 59 81 78 943 melanie.baudisch@eads.com	All	OPEN
23 Oct 2008	41	3	CORE Team members are requested to work with Bryant Allen and Trine Hansen to resolve comments	CORE Team	OPEN
23 Oct 2008	41	4	Reference data library project review ballot comments for project applicability and send out historical documents for review and comment	Mats Nilsson	OPEN
					
15 Dec 2008	42	2	Check on next release date for PLCS Web Services	Nigel Shaw	OPEN
15 Dec 2008	42	4	Send list of events and dates to Secretariat for posting on OASIS website.	All	STANDING ACTION

Minutes:
OASIS Product Life Cycle Support Technical Committee 

Meeting 44  Teleconference  6 April 2009 - 1600 CET, 1500 UK, 1400 GMT, 1000 US Eastern, and 0700 US Pacific Time - for maximum 90 minutes.  

Objective

The principal objectives of this session were to update the TC members on progress with the active tasks in Phase 2 of the DEX activity, and continuing efforts to identify new resources to address the unassigned tasks.  Members were invited to highlight new DEX development projects.  

1.	Welcome by Chair

	Welcome remarks by Chair
	Purpose of the meeting is to check on the progress of Phase 2

2.	Roll call 
	See Attendance_plcs_Meeting44_200-04-06.xls

Meeting Statistics
Quorum rule	51% of voting members
Achieved quorum	false
Counts toward voter eligibility	true
Individual Attendance	Members: 12 of 115 (10%) 
Voting Members: 9 of 22 (40%) (used for quorum calculation) 
Company Attendance	Companies: 9 of 29 (31%) 
Voting Companies: 7 of 13 (53%) 

Meeting Attendees
Name	Company	Status
Howard Mason	BAE SYSTEMS plc	Group Member
Nils Sandsmark	Det Norske Veritas (DNV)*	Group Member
Nicolas Figay	EADS	Guest
Rob Bodington	Eurostep AB*	Group Member
Ron Kolakowski	ManTech Enterprise Integration Center (e-IC)*	Group Member
Christopher Kreiler	ManTech Enterprise Integration Center (e-IC)*	Group Member
Tor Arne Irgens	Norwegian Defence Logistics Organization*	Group Member
Leif Gyllstrom	Saab AB	Group Member
Phil Rutland	UK Ministry of Defence Technical Information*	Group Member
Richard Brewer	US Department of Defense (DoD)*	Group Member
Jerry Smith	US Department of Defense (DoD)*	Group Member
Bryant Allen	USAMC Logistics Support Activity*	Group Member
John Peer	USAMC Logistics Support Activity*	Group Member


3.	Report of Technical Oversight Group (Tor Arne Irgens) 
	Report of TOG telecons
Action item 38/1: The TOG Chair is invited to reform the TOG with an additional focus on harmonization (Tor Arne Irgens - completed)
	Two telecons had been held in March and April.  Tried to redirect some of the frustrations within the TOG.  Method has been to let people speak their minds.
	The following report was presented (report in italics - TC discussion inserted)
Purpose of TOG
The TOG area of expertise is Technical Overview. In order to express the purpose of TOG the group used an open brainstorming with several iterations. In each iteration the reached consensus was repeated, further explored and enhanced. This method was applied to ensure that each person could contribute his tacit knowledge, without being constrained by the explicit wording in the current TOR.  Based on the discussion in the group, the following was agreed.
o	Ensure quality, offer advice, promote coordination and cooperation
The overall purpose of TOG is to ENSURE QUALITY, with focus on both DEVELOPMENT and USAGE. For DEVELOPMENT the focus is on CONSISTENCY and for USAGE the focus is INTEROPERABILITY. To promote CONSISTENCY and INTEROPERABILITY, TOG offers advice to members of the TC for TC consideration on matters under the OASIS charter.  Further TOG may offer advice regarding the ISO area of interest to include representatives to ISO TC 184/SC 4.  The purpose of such advice is to enhance quality and to promote coordination and cooperation for effective usage of the resources available. 
The TOG should document the process for developing DEXs and how a Business DEX becomes an OASIS DEX. The decision as to whether the DEX should be an OASIS DEX is made through the TC ballot process. 
o	Harvesting 
TOG should be able to offer advice on technical aspects of TC member needs and requirement in the development and usage of PLCS. The aim is that the TOG should advice on possible harvesting of existing work and point out resource efficient solutions to address user needs. Such advice is not limited to suggestions solely based on PLCS assets, but includes approaches utilizing other open international standards that can benefit the PLCS community. 
Process summary is TOG reviews and recommends to the TC.  TC approves submittals for OASIS balloting
o	Liaison between OASIS and ISO
It was discussed whether the liaison between OASIS and ISO on technical aspects should be formalized through TOG. No conclusion was reached, and this will be offered to the TC for consideration. 
TC invites the TOG to manage the technical liaison to ISO.
o	Liaison to other groups
There are a number of other groups, both user groups and standardisation bodies that work on areas of benefit to technical aspects of PLCS. TOG should follow such activities for the benefit of the TC. 
There could be other groups developing e.g. Business DEXs. Some of the potential conflicts could be avoided by the TC making the requirements clear for how a DEX is standardised under OASIS.
o	Road map of DEX development
There are several projects either under way or under planning that will develop or utilize a range of DEXs. In order to communicate the touching point, potential overlaps and opportunities for cooperation a Road map of DEX development should be established and maintained by TOG. 
The TOG should take an active role in managing the development of the DEXs according to the roadmap. 
o	Implementers Forum
In order to ensure quality in usage, TOG strongly recommends the TC to set up an IMPLEMENTERS FORUM. TOG does not recommend that an IMPLEMENTERS FORUM is a formal part of the TOG. There should be ONE representative from the IMPLEMENTERS FORUM to the TOG. There should be a clear separation between the two to sustain TOG integrity as a Technical Adviser to the TC. However this should not preclude TOG to offer advice to issues at hand in the IMPLEMENTERS FORUM.
TC accepted TOG recommendation for a separate implementers forum under the TC.  Membership should be open to any DEX implementation activity, which in turn demanded clear visibility of the set of DEX under development (Standing Action 37/5).  DEXs could be seen as mini-conformance classes 
o	Funding of Implementers Forum
TOG recommends the TC to consider a fee based model for the IMPLEMENTERS FORUM. Even though most of the activities in an IMPLEMENTERS FORUM would be suitable for pay-as-you-play, either pay a fee to be a member of the implementers forum, or pay to participate in a test ,there is a need for certain support such as administration, ensuring availability and suitability of test sets. This support should be independent of the implementers. 
Chris questioned whether the implementers forum should be part of the SC 4 implementation forum.  Tor Arne noted that this would mean that each DEX has to be an SC 4 standard, and it was felt that a link to the SC 4 group would be valuable.
The question of funding for the forum was outstanding, noting that tax for quality assurance doesnt work well.
Chair reminded everyone of action item 37/2: Pull together the revised proposal for the implementers forum for discussion for the next telecom. (Howard Mason and Nils Sandsmark) 
o	Funding of TOG
It would be a great advantage if a long term structure and engagement could be secured. However the years after PLCS Inc have demonstrated all to clear the challenges to achieve this. The TC members are encouraged to secure funding for TOG activities as part of any development and implementation contracts awarded. 
This should be raised on the TC call. 
Members were urged to ensure that development plans included funding for all PLCS TC activities.
Summary of TOG Responsibilities
o	Ensure quality in development through advice.
o	Ensure quality in usage through assisting an Implementers Forum.
TOG membership
To sustain the activities above TOG should have a competence focused membership. The recommendation is a small number of persons in the TOG. Preferably max 10 members. Each member should have a clearly defined role and responsibility.  Representation from implementation projects should be through the implementers forum
TC agrees with approach to TOG membership

Action item 44/1: TOG to list competencies for TOG membership (TOG)
	No activity on PLCS Information Pages

4.	Report on second phase (Howard Mason)
	Review of resource commitments
See revised spreadsheet for breakdown of tasks and commitments.  (Phase_II_v8.xls) (http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/plcs/download.php/29624/Phase_II_v8.xls)
Action item 44/2: Chair and Secretariat to go through work program to see what weve already done and what remains. (Howard Mason, Chris Kreiler)
	Implementers Forum
Action item 37/2: Pull together the revised proposal for the implementers forum for discussion for the next telecom. (Howard Mason and Nils Sandsmark) 
	See earlier discussion

	New DEX proposals (Standing Action item 37/5)
Action item 39/3: UK MOD to summarize DEXs under development for posting on OASIS website (UK MOD)
	No clear view of DEX set(s) from UKMOD.   Andy Burden working on list

	TDP proposal update (N. Figay)
	Solution providers giving input to determine way ahead
	Meeting produced a number of presentations on the TDP
	2 pilot projects: (1) internal Airbus PLM implementation and (2) a SEINE project
	Collaboration with AIA Data Interoperability Group and AIA/ASD LOTAR project on how they can use PLCS to facilitate TDP
	Very little feedback thus far from PLCS members
	Working with ProStep to encourage modular AP214
Action item 41/2: Members interested in developing the Airbus TDP DEX are requested to contact Melanie Baudisch at EADS MAS +49 84 59 81 78 943 melanie.baudisch@eads.com (All)

5.	Ballot comment resolution of first DEX package  (Bryant Allen)
	Aviation Maintenance DEX
	Task DEX
Action item 41/3: CORE Team members are requested to work with Bryant Allen and Trine Hansen to resolve comments (CORE Team)
	DEX comment resolution team still needs to get together to agree who is working which comments and get status
	70-80% comments complete on Aviation DEX
	Resolved Task DEX comments and some comments against templates
	Teleconference tentatively scheduled for 2009-04-09.  Rob Bodington to set up teleconference at 1300 UK time, 1400 Central Europe time, 0800 Eastern Standard Time

6.	Reference data (Mats Nilsson) 
	Report of activities on PLCS Reference Data
Action item 41/4: Reference data library project review ballot comments for project applicability and send out historical documents for review and comment (Mats Nilsson)
	Workshop for reference data scheduled for 5-8 May

7.	AP239 ed 2 (Phil Rutland / Rob Bodington) 
	Report of activities on PLCS AP 239 ed 2
	Resources for supporting the ballot/resolution activities
Action item 41/1: Members interested in assisting with AP239ed2 development are requested to contact Phil Rutland (UKMOD) at phil.rutland517@mod.uk (Complete)

	Built consensus on common modules with AP203, 209, 210, and 233
	Used latest editions of modules
	Frozen the changes that will be made
	Extended Selects
	Added:
o	System / non abstract Product
o	Analysis
o	Validation & verification
	Created:
o	Collection
o	Product Environment
o	Same-as
o	Conditional effectivity
o	Identification relations
	Modified:
o	Message
o	Observation
o	Resources
o	Product category  removed from modules
o	Justification  added assumption
	Intent is to submit NWI-CD/TS, then DIS, noting that as the modules are being submitted to NWI-CD ballot, there is no reason to skip the CD of the AP itself, as any DIS ballot cannot start until after the NWI is completed and approved
	The Chair offered his congratulations to all concerned!  
	Members were invited to nominate resources for the ballot resolution process (41/1)
	The TC considered the question as to when the edition 2 changes are incorporated into DEXlib.  A related question is what changes are permitted as a result of the PLCS OASIS ballot.
Background
1)	AP239 ed1 was published 2004  for clarity, the schema is referred to as  ap239_iso_ed1_schema
2)	DEXlib was developed  and the DEXS Task_set and Aviation Maintenance were submitted for OASIS ballot.  As a result some changes were made to ap239_iso_ed1_schema. The DEXLib schema is referred to as ap239_oasis_ed1_schema.
3)	Av DEX + Task DEX has been published for ballot with ap239_oasis_ed1_schema
4)	AP239 ed2 is in development. Changes have  been made to  ap239_iso_ed1_schema  resulting in ap239_iso_ed2_schema  this incorporates  the changes from ap239_oasis_ed1_schema  but is not exactly the same.
5)	Av DEX + Task DEX have been balloted, but not yet had all ballot issues addressed yet.
4 approaches were described
1)	Remove the changes to ap239_oasis_ed1_schema  and make DEXlib use ap239_iso_ed1_schema. 
The consequences are:
	Existing templates will have to change
	Software implementation will have to be updated to reflect the changes

 
2)	Allow no changes to ap239_oasis_ed1_schema and publish the completed Av DEX + Task DEX with ap239_oasis_ed1_schema. In parallel develop DEXlib2 that addresses some template issues, and brings in the changes from ap239_iso_ed2_schema. 
The consequences are:
	No existing templates change a number of the ballot comments  will be ignored;
	No change to Software implementation at this stage. Implementations continue to use some complex mapping and misuse reference data;
	DEXlib2 will change templates;
	Future software implementation will have to change to use the new edition of dexlib - DEXlib2.

3)	As part of the ballot resolution for the Av DEX + Task DEX, bring in some of the changes with no  compatibility issues on a case by case basis. 
The consequences are:
	If the changes have no compatibility issues, i.e. new entities or select extensions, incorporate the change and create ap239_oasis_ed2_schema which is part of the Av DEX + Task DEX publication
	In parallel develop DEXlib2 that addresses some template issues, and brings in all the changes from ap239_iso_ed2_schema
	This should not impact existing templates.  New business templates may be created, but no new OASIS templates.
	Software implementation will have to accommodate new entities i.e. read them, but as no new oasis templates, not be required to do anything with them. 
	Future software implementation will have to change to use the new edition of dexlib - DEXlib2

4)	As part of the ballot resolution for the Av DEX + Task DEX, bring in some of the changes with compatibility issues .
The consequences are: 
	change and create ap239_oasis_ed2_schema  which is part of the Av DEX + Task DEX publication
	In parallel develop DEXlib2 that addresses some template issues, and brings in all the changes from ap239_iso_ed2_schema
	Some template changes
	Software implementations change  but will be more stable in the long run
The agreed resolution was:
1)	Address the ballot comments raised against the Av DEX + Task DEX + templates. In so doing, make some modifications to ap239_oasis_ed1_schema and the associated templates. 
However, before any modification is made, the impact should be assessed with consideration given to: the impact on implementations, the amount of change in DEXlib. This will result in a new set of Av DEX + Task DEX + templates that will be published.
It was agreed that changes should be made to the Message and Observation templates to reflect the changes in ap239_iso_ed2_schema.
It was agreed that the assigning_reference data template would not be updated at this stage to use the new capability in ap239_iso_ed2_schema. The reference data itself will however be modified to allow individuals as well as classes.
2)	A parallel DEXLib development stream (DEXLib 2) will be established which is based on ap239_iso_ed2_schema. Each DEX and template will be migrated to DEXLib2 and checked and corrected to use ap239_iso_ed2_schema. Thos will become the production library, and the current version can be maintained as necessary to support current implementations

8.	PLCS Web Services Report (Rob Bodington)
Publication of PLCS Web Services as an OASIS standard - review of new draft
Action item 27/4: Establish contact with OASIS Web Services TC and make PLCS Web Services visible within OASIS (Howard Mason, Rob Bodington, and Nigel Shaw)
Action item 27/5: Review and comment on the level of granularity for PLCS Web Services (All)
Action item 27/6: Determine publication method for PLCS Web Services (Chair, Rob Bodington)
Action item 42/2: Check on next release date for PLCS Web Services (Nigel Shaw)
	No more progress

9.	Feedback from Implementations
Action item 33/2: Members are requested to develop a one-page information sheet on their implementation projects for posting on the OASIS PLCS TC website (All)
Members are invited to present recent pilot activities. 
	Feedback on PLCS success stories. 
	Tangible business benefits. 
	Issues and requirements
a)	Norwegian Deployment

o	Approached NAMSA about PLCS.  Was well received 
o	JSF4I study on open standards with ALIS results in 2-3 weeks.
o	NOLITO  Saab/EPM  looked at business process needs at Saab.  Uses Product Breakdown for Support and Task.  Adjusted a couple of DEXs.  Available on DEXLib under NOLITO.  Work concluded.  Shows it is possible to use 2 DEXs to get information from 2 different sources into a single repository for Gripen aircraft.
o	S3000L and 5000F coming out as cooperative project between U.S. and Europe

b)	Swedish activities
o	Leif Gyllstrom met with NAMSA and briefed on S3000L and 5000F

c)	UKMoD LCIA and CBIS
o	Continuing

d)	LOGSA
o	GEIA-0007 will have a new revision this year to enable assigning resources at the subtask level
o	Creating DEXs from 0007.  Revised 9 of the DEXs up to this point.  All on DEXLib under LOGSA

e)	AIA Engineering Data Interoperability Project
o	Available on public side of AIA website
o	http://www.aia-aerospace.org/assets/aerospace_interoperability_standards_021209.pdf
o	Collaboration with AIA Data Interoperability Group and AIA/ASD LOTAR project on how they can use PLCS to facilitate TDP

f)	ASD - AeroSpace and Defence Industries Association of Europe
o	Strategic Standardisation Group pushing for use of modular APs 

10.	Promotional activities
Action item 42/4: Send list of events and dates to Secretariat for posting on OASIS website. (All)
	Outreach
o	Future events
	2009-05-04/08 Reference Data meeting Painswick, UK
	2009-05-17/20 The Collaboration & Interoperability Conference (http://www.3dcic.com/) Estes Park, Colorado USA.  PLCS and PLM is one of the breakout sessions.
	2009-05-17/22 ISO/TC 184/SC 4 57th Plenary, Parksville, British Columbia, Canada (near US)
	No new events reported

o	www.et.gov - (waiting DEX availability)
Action 19/8: Nigel Shaw to look into the types of XML schemas being covered by et.gov, and provide feedback on whether the OASIS PLCS TC should offer material to et.gov. (Nigel Shaw)
Action 22/12: Recheck to see if posting material and a link to the PLCS ePortal would be beneficial. (Nigel Shaw)

	No report

o	Presentations and General Information folder
	No report

	Marketing Links
Action 15/20: Chair (Howard Mason) to check with OASIS, James Clark, to see if list of organizations that provide PLCS services can be done

	No report


11.	Liaisons
	SC4 (Tim King)
Action item 37/7: SC4 experts to monitor impact of cross AP implementation project.

	Other OASIS TCs
o	Codelist (Nigel Shaw)
Action 26/1: Continue to track activities of OASIS Codelist TC for impact on reference data requirements (Nigel Shaw) 
	No report  out of time

	ASD (Carl Wilen/Howard Mason)
	No report  out of time

	POSC/CAESAR (Nils Sandsmark)
	No report  out of time

	GEIA (Bryant Allen) 
	No report  out of time

	Life Cycle Information Management AC/327  (Tor Arne Irgens)
	No report  out of time

	MoU between PLCS, SCORM, and S1000D
	No report  out of time

12.	OASIS Administration
	Web site
Members were invited to comment on any issues related to the web site
	No report  out of time

13.	Future meeting schedule, hosts

	2009-06-10 next teleconference Meeting 45

14.	Any Other Business

	None

15.	Open Action Items
Meeting Date and Number	Action Item #	Action Item	Responsibility	Closed
14 Apr 2005	15	20	Chair(Howard Mason) to check with OASIS, James Clark, to see if list of organizations that provide PLCS services can be done	Howard Mason	OPEN
					
29 Sep 2005	19	8	Nigel Shaw to look into the types of XML schemas being covered by et.gov, and given the changing state of P28e2, provide feedback on whether the OASIS PLCS TC should offer material to et.gov.	Nigel Shaw	Awaiting first DEX
					
10 Jan 2006	22	12	Recheck to see if posting material and a link to the PLCS ePortal would be beneficial	Nigel Shaw	Awaiting first DEX
					
7 Sep 2006	26	1	Continue to track activities of OASIS Codelist TC for impact on reference data requirements	Nigel Shaw	OPEN
					
31 Oct 2006	27	4	Establish contact with OASIS Web Services TC and make PLCS Web Services visible within OASIS	Howard Mason
Rob Bodington
Nigel Shaw	OPEN
31 Oct 2006	27	5	Review and comment on the level of granularity for PLCS Web Services	All	OPEN
31 Oct 2006	27	6	Determine publication method for PLCS Web Services	Howard Mason
Rob Bodington	OPEN
					
30 Aug 2007	33	2	Members are requested to develop a one-page information sheet on their implementation projects for posting on the OASIS PLCS TC website	All	STANDING ACTION
					
11 Mar 2008	37	2	Pull together the revised proposal for the implementers forum for discussion for the next telecom. 	Howard Mason Nils Sandsmark	OPEN
11 Mar 2008	37	5	Document DEX development proposals	All	STANDING ACTION
11 Mar 2008	37	7	SC4 experts to monitor impact of cross AP implementation project.	SC4 Experts	OPEN
					
25 Jun 2008	39	3	LOGSA and UK MOD to summarize DEXs under development for posting on OASIS website	UK MOD	OPEN
					
					
23 Oct 2008	41	1	Members interested in assisting with AP239ed2 development are requested to contact Phil Rutland (UKMOD) at phil.rutland517@mod.uk
All	Closed 2009-04-06
23 Oct 2008	41	2	Members interested in developing the Airbus TDP DEX are requested to contact Melanie Baudisch at EADS MAS +49 84 59 81 78 943 melanie.baudisch@eads.com	All	OPEN
23 Oct 2008	41	3	CORE Team members are requested to work with Bryant Allen and Trine Hansen to resolve comments	CORE Team	OPEN
23 Oct 2008	41	4	Reference data library project review ballot comments for project applicability and send out historical documents for review and comment	Mats Nilsson	OPEN
					
15 Dec 2008	42	2	Check on next release date for PLCS Web Services	Nigel Shaw	OPEN
15 Dec 2008	42	4	Send list of events and dates to Secretariat for posting on OASIS website.	All	STANDING ACTION
					
6 Apr 2009	44	1	TOG to list competencies for TOG membership	TOG	
6 Apr 2009	44	2	Chair and Secretariat to go through work program to see what weve already done and what remains. 	Howard Mason, Chris Kreiler	

View event details:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/plcs/event.php?event_id=23792

PLEASE NOTE:  If the above link does not work for you, your email
application may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to
copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web
browser.

Referenced Items
Date            Name                             Type
----            ----                             ----
2009-04-04      Agenda_Meeting_44_20090406_Rev1.docAgenda
2009-05-01      Minutes_Meeting_44_20090406_Rev2.docReference Document
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:PUBLISH
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Kavi Corporation//NONSGML Kavi Groups//EN
X-WR-CALNAME:My Calendar
BEGIN:VEVENT
CATEGORIES:MEETING
STATUS:TENTATIVE
DTSTAMP:20090501T000000Z
DTSTART:20090406T140000Z
DTEND:20090406T153000Z
SEQUENCE:4
SUMMARY:PLCS Meeting 44 Teleconference
DESCRIPTION:Meeting 44  Teleconference - 6 April 2009 - 1600 CET\, 1500 UK\, 1400
  GMT\, 1000 US Eastern\, and 0700 US Pacific Time - for maximum 90
  minutes.  \n\nDial-in numbers & passcodes:\n\nPARTICIPANTS PIN NUMBER:
       499596 #\n\n  \nCountry	Number\nAustria	0800 999
  808\nBelgium	0800 48736\nFrance	0805 110 496\nGermany	0800 101
  4935\nIreland	1800 992 217\nItaly	800 985 528\nSpain	900 998
  979\nSweden	0200 895 376\nSwitzerland	0800 000 385\nUSA	1866 874
  0924\nUK Free Call	0800 694 0271\nUK Local Call	0845 144 0023\nStd Int
  Dial In	+44 (0) 1452 542 437\n\nGroup: OASIS Product Life Cycle
  Support (PLCS) TC\nCreator: Mr. Christopher Kreiler
URL:http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/plcs/event.php?event_id=23792
UID:http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/plcs/event.php?event_id=23792
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]