[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [pmrm] PMRM TC new meeting times: a poll
|
Some internal meetings got moved
on top of the current 11am Eastern time. Since I am on the west coast, a
10am session is 7am for me (and less than ideal). 1pm Eastern on
Thursdays would work great. Andrea Westerinen CA Technologies From:
micheledrgon@dataprobity.com [mailto:micheledrgon@dataprobity.com] 2nd and 4th Thurs at 11 is NIST Smart Grid
Privacy so there go (at least) Gail and I. 11:00 any
day is a NIST meeting……. Can we do a 10 or a 1 on any day? Thanks! From: Michael Willett
[mailto:mwillett@nc.rr.com] Privateers - At the last PMRM TC telecom, we discussed trying to find a
suitable, alternate meeting time for our monthly formal meetings (and the
in-between informal meetings). In order to minimize the number of e-mail exchanges, this
poll will consist of several parts: (1) Everyone
determine if the current schedule (2nd and 4th Thursday
of every month) does or does not work for you.
ONLY the people for which the current schedule does NOT work should proceed to
Part (2). Routinely does not work; not just occasionally. (2) You
have arrived at part (2) because the current schedule does not work for you. And, hopefully you want to be
actively involved in our activities. Jot down the regular days and times of any month that
work for you and send ME (and only me) that information. Pattern your
answer after our current format: xx and yy dd(:day) of every month,
at zz time. (3) I
will find the common times (if any) from these responses and (4) poll
the whole group with those new days/times. (5) We
may or may not find a new time that fits MORE of us than the current schedule. Preview of coming poll: The other issue raised was having a
Face/Face meeting soon, to go through a Use Case in person. The default location is
DC, using John’s CA conference room. Tentatively mentioned were Wed/Thurs, 25-26 May (or, ONE of
those days). John and I plan to talk Monday about those options and the possibility of
some partial expenses being covered by the ID Trust members section. Of course, we would need the participation of the key people
related to the Use Case, whether that is Smart Grid or Emergency Responder. I have not yet figured out how to minimize the mathematical
complexity of that poll, so no replies now; unless you have a real showstopper. Michael |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]