RE: [provision] Agenda for 6/10/2002 PSTC Call

[Darran Rolls <Darran.Rolls@waveset.com>]

No minutes where taken, it was a short issues discussion on how we move
onto the next step, something we will discuss again today.

--------------------------------------------------------
Darran Rolls                      http://www.waveset.com
Waveset Technologies Inc          drolls@waveset.com 
(512) 657 8360                    
--------------------------------------------------------

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gavenraj Sodhi [mailto:Gavenraj.Sodhi@businesslayers.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:50 AM
> To: Darran Rolls; provision@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [provision] Agenda for 6/10/2002 PSTC Call
> 
> Darran,
> 
> My understanding is that last week's call was an "unofficial call."
> Please
> advise as we should probably accept the F2F #2 Minutes today.
> 
> 
> -Gavenraj
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darran Rolls [mailto:Darran.Rolls@waveset.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 4:12 PM
> To: provision@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [provision] Agenda for 6/10/2002 PSTC Call
> 
> 
> CONFERENCE ID
> =============
> Dial-in Number: 888-742-8686
> Conference ID: 5250215
> Date: 06/10/2002
> Time 12 noon CST.
> 
> Proposed Agenda
> ===============
> 
> 1 - 12:05   Order and role-call
> -------------------------------
> 
> 2 - 12:10 Vote to accept minutes of committee meeting 05/29/2002
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Minutes published [1].
> 
> 3 - 12:15 Update on business white paper
> ----------------------------------------
> Gavenraj.
> 
> 4 - 12:20 Use Cases
> -------------------
> No comments posted from the last editorial revision of the SMPL use
> cases document.  Can we therefore consider the document accurate and
> complete (at least for now)?
> 
> In Tim Moses comments [2] he suggested using XACML filtering for use
> case 20.  Discuss.
> 
> 5 - 12:30 Competitive Submissions
> ---------------------------------
> It was suggested during the working group call 5/29 that we adopt a
> competitive submission system in an effort to try and move quickly
> towards a 01 specification.  I'd like to construct a formal statement
to
> this effect.  Consider the following straw-man to start the
discussion:
> 
> 6 - 12:45 Vote on perusing SMPL interop for Catalyst next year
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> I propose running an email vote for PSTC perusing an SPML interop at
> next years Burton Groups Catalyst conference (details of the SAML
> interop this year [3]). Any issues?
> 
> 7 - 12:50 Suggestions for the next F2F
> ---------------------------------------
> We had originally estimated an F2F3 for June. In light of the
discussion
> during agenda item 5, do we want to consider setting a revised date?
> 
> 8 - 13:00 Motion to Adjourn
> ---------------------------
> 
> References
> ==========
> [1]
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/provision/200204/msg00023.html
> [2]
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/provision/200205/msg00014.html
> (item 20)
> [3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/security/#announcements (see
> Events)
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Darran Rolls                      http://www.waveset.com
> Waveset Technologies Inc          drolls@waveset.com
> (512) 657 8360
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>