[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [provision] SPML FAQ
Good first draft... Should we add to question/answer 4 details on our WSS binding and inclusion of SAML assertions as identifiers? ========================================================= Darran Rolls http://www.waveset.com Waveset Technologies Inc drolls@waveset.com (512) 657 8360 ========================================================= > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Bohren [mailto:jbohren@opennetwork.com] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 6:39 PM > To: provision@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [provision] SPML FAQ > > Here is my stab it this: > > What is the need for this specification? > > One of the biggest challenges in provisioning is adapting to a disparate > set of protocol and methodologies. This poses a great challenge to both > provisioning vendors and implementers of custom provisioning systems. > The industry would benefit if some level of standardization could be > brought to bear on this problem. > > > > Who should be involved in this development? > > Any vendor that develops provisioning systems or intends to integrate > with provisioning systems. Also any organization developing custom built > provisioning solutions. Any organization involved in identity management > should also participate. > > > > Who will benefit from this work and how? > > Both provisioning vendors and their customers will benefit from > increased standardization. The will result in lower costs, quicker > implementations, and a wider range of supported systems. > > > > How does this work compare with related efforts at other standards > organizations? When will this specification be completed? > > The SPML 1.0 specification is built on the OASIS DSMLv2 specification, > allthough it is focused on provisioning. Additionally there is a > relationship, although not an overlap, between SPML 1.0 and federated > identity standards, such as Project Liberty. > > The SPML 1.0 specification has been approved as a committee > specification of the PS TC and will soon be submitted to OASIS at large. > > > Jeff Bohren > Product Architect > OpenNetwork Technologies, Inc > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Darran Rolls [mailto:Darran.Rolls@waveset.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 12:31 PM > To: provision@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [provision] SPML FAQ > > > Folks > > OASIS is changing the Kavi based system to paste up an FAQ section for > each TC. Here are the proposed Q's, does someone want to take the lead > on drafting some A's? > > What is the need for this specification? > Who should be involved in this development? > Who will benefit from this work and how? > How does this work compare with related efforts at other standards > organizations? When will this specification be completed? > > ========================================================= > Darran Rolls http://www.waveset.com > Waveset Technologies Inc drolls@waveset.com > (512) 657 8360 > ========================================================= > > > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/provision/members/leave_wor > kgroup.php > > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting > http://www.oasis- > open.org/apps/org/workgroup/provision/members/leave_workgroup.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]