provision message

Subject: Draft 9: ActiveResponseType#active.

From: Gary P Cole <Gary.P.Cole@Sun.COM>
To: Jeff Bohren <jbohren@opennetwork.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 15:06:19 -0600

Jeff, would it be just as easy to define "active" as an attribute 
use="optional" (rather than an element minOccurs="0")? 

An element seems like overkill for a boolean.  Even if we changed 
"active" from a boolean to an enumeration, that's still a simple type. 

gpc