[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: 20050208 Editor's call minutes.
NOTE: These minutes are from *last* Tuesday. I'll publish the minutes from this week's Editor's call soon. (Short call--won't take long.)
Participants in this morning's working group call discussed: - reference capability questions Attendees: - Jeff Bohren (Open Networks) - Darran Rolls (Sun) - Gary Cole (Sun) After reviewing the reference examples from the Houston Face-to-Face, Gary Cole expressed several concerns about the Reference Capability. 1) Without discoverable meta-data describing the connection types and which schema entities each connection type may connect, Reference Capability does not promote interoperability. Jeff Bohren answered this concern by saying that the approach agreed at the Houston Face-to-Face DID include discoverable meta-data. We simply failed to capture this facet in our notes and examples. 2) Since references may span targets, it may be problematic for a provider to declare as part of a target's support for the ReferenceCapability any type of Reference that refers to a schema entity on another target. Jeff Bohren addressed this concern by saying that it should be possible to declare as part of a target A a referenceType that refers to an entity on another target B. It may not be as simple as referring to an entity that is supported by the target A (since one of target A's SupportedSchemaEntity must already define a convenient "alias" for that entity), but targetA could specify the 'toEntity' for that referenceType using the more canonical syntax of the SchemaEntityRefType. 3) Aside from the scalability benefit (which results from the ability to exclude references from the schema-defined XML 'data' of each object), the ReferenceCapability seems to offer little benefit over schema-defined attributes that "just happen" to refer to arbitrary objects. In particular, there is little benefit to interoperability. Jeff Bohren addressed this concern by saying that the Reference Capability would be very valuable in conjunction with a "standard" schema (i.e., in any profile or binding that assumes a certain schema). We must define the Reference Capability now in order to exploit it with subsequent profiles. Action Items ------------ 1) Jeff Bohren to supply examples of defining named reference types (i.e., discoverable meta-data for references) and modifying references. 2) Gary Cole to work offline with Jeff Bohren to reconstruct agreement wrt Reference Capability and then update draft spec accordingly.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]