Re: [provision] SPML 2.0 Interop, draft 1...

[Gary P Cole <Gary.P.Cole@Sun.COM>]

A few comments/questions:

1) What about the XSD Profile?
    I think it would be valuable to exercise both of the profiles we 
publish.

2) Do we like the terms "client" and "service" better than "requestor" 
and "provider"?
    If so, I can update the spec to use the preferred terms.

3) Would each client try to run the same scenarios against each service?
    Is that what you meant by a "mesh" interop?

4) Would it be interesting to expose a single resource (e.g., an LDAP 
directory)
    that all of the services could manage?  If we can all manage identities
    on the same resource without stepping on each other, that'd  be 
impressive.

Bohren, Jeffrey wrote:

> Attached is the first draft of the SPML 2.0 Interop Document.
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Jeff Bohren*
>
> 13577 Feather Sound Drive, Suite 200, Clearwater, FL 33762
>
> tel: 727.561.9500 x219
>
> fax: 727.374.0171
>
> Jeffrey_Bohren@bmc.com <mailto:Jeffrey_Bohren@bmc.com>
>
> www.bmc.com <http://www.bmc.com/>
>
>  
>