RE: [provision] WSDL for SPMLv2

["Raepple, Martin" <martin.raepple@sap.com>]

Hi James,

thanks for posting this work to the TC. I think it can help a lot in
improving interoperability between different vendor implementations. One
thing I noticed is that the spmlv2_wsheder.xsd file defines a
WS-Security header element (wsse:Security) in the serviceHeaderType
which is referenced by each operation in spmlv2_core.wsdl. On the other
side, in the specification we say that WS-Security SHOULD be used for
message integrity / confidentiality, but it is not mandatory. So I am
wondering if this element in the header type should be treated as
optional or even be removed from the XSD?

Best regards
Martin

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Hu, James [mailto:james.hu@hp.com] 
>Sent: Dienstag, 11. September 2007 22:07
>To: Bohren, Jeff; provision@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: [provision] WSDL for SPMLv2
>
>Jeff,
>
>   As mentioned in the TC meeting, the attached document covers the
>proposed WSDL/SPML standardization approach. It is intended to serve as
>a start point for discussion.
>
>Regards,
>James
>