Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Farrukh,

I completely agree with you. The spec is written in such a way that it
is difficult to digest. Perhaps this may help: I've attached several
high-level summary documents that we created during our CC Review
Subteam work last year. Although these documents are based on previous
versions of the CC Spec, the high-level concepts are (for the most part)
the same. 

One document (Core Components Summary v1.69a.doc) is my summary of the
basic CC concepts. The other 2 documents (Figure 7-X CC Spec) are a
summary of entities and metadata attributes contained in 2 figures from
the previous version of the CC spec, along with examples.

What I'd like to suggest is that the Team review these summary
documents, and if further clarifications are needed, we can certainly
schedule a call.

Does that sound good to you?

Thanks,
Joe

Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> 
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
> >CC Review Team,
> >
> >Welcome! Today begins the official kickoff of our Core Components XML
> >Serialization work. I would like to thank you in advance for your
> >contributions to this valuable work.
> >
> >For those who may not have a copy of the December 2002 (v1.9) Core
> >Components Technical Specification, please see attached. This week, I
> >hope we can accomplish the following:
> >
> >(1) CCTS Review and Clarification:
> >
> >- All members please review Section 7 (p.74) of spec, and offer up to
> >our listserv any questions you have. This is the section that we will be
> >verifying for the UN/CEFACT CCTS Team.
> >
> >- Please also start thinking in terms of which metadata entities and
> >attributes can map to our current RIM architecture, and in what way.
> >
> Joe,
> 
> I tried reading the CCTS spec and am having much trouble digesting it. I
> think it would be a good idea, if as a first step, you could schedule a
> sub-team meeting and go over the CCTS info model and core concepts. What
> do other team members think?
> 
> >
> >(2) Requirements:
> >
> >- At our recent Registry TC call, we discussed compiling a list of
> >requirements as soon as possible.
> >
> >- Beyond the obvious requirement that our work comply with the CCTS 1.9
> >spec to the greatest degree possible, what are some other requirements?
> >
> >
> >
> Other requirement sugestions:
> 
> -Must align well with ebXML Registry specs by maximizing leverage and
> minimizing overlap.
> 
> Deliverables include:
> 
> -A specification describing how to represent CC artifacts in XML with an
> XML Schema and related semantic rules, design patterns and conventions
> as its basis.
> 
> --
> Farrukh

CC Specs.zip

begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard