Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

and what if there is NO available XML format?!?

>> There will be - that's what we are creating.

why would we want to store the other binary goup - since we can't do
anything with that meaningful!!!

>> An ebXML registry can store this as an Extrinsic object.

If the CCTS folks already think they have that "available XML format",

>> They don't - that's our job

then we need to realize that any non-XML gets either stored as a binary
- or a pointer to its extrinsic instance.

>> Yes - how is this different than our current registry architecture?

And we need an XML serialization system to actually manage the
semantics.

>> Yes - and again, that is our mission.

But we critically need to understand what those semantics are

>> Please give concrete examples of what the CCTS does not provide that you think it should.

Joe

David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:
> 
> Joe,
> 
> Look at what you just wrote please!
> 
> "other formats stored <snip> along with the equivalent XML format".
> 
> That's exactly the point -and what if there is NO available XML format?!?
> 
> And if there is an available XML format - why would we want to store the
> other binary goup - since we can't do anything with that meaningful!!!
> 
> If the CCTS folks already think they have that "available XML format",
> then we are wasting our time.  If they don't - then we need to realize
> that any non-XML gets either stored as a binary - or a pointer to its
> extrinsic instance.  And we need an XML serialization system to
> actually manage the semantics.   But we critically need to understand
> what those semantics are - so we're not reinventing XMI or UML,
> but simply providing a means to capture vocabularies of nouns,
> aggregates and logical core components.
> 
> DW.
> 
> Message text written by "Chiusano Joseph"
> >
> I was not looking at XML serialization to perform that role, but rather
> to have these "other format" objects stored in the registry along with
> the equivalent XML format (for example, 2 representations of an object -
> one XML, the other UML). Then, these 2 representations would be
> associated using the registry association mechanism.
> 
> Please tell me if I am missing something.
> <
begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard