[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!
I can clarify: We pondered that approach several months ago (updating RIM to accomodate CCTS requirements), but decided that it was best not to touch the RIM, but rather to either (a) create a RIM binding, or (b) express the CCTS metadata in XML format, as a "wrapper" to the XML representation of the Core Component (i.e. an XML serialization). We then decided on approach (b) for several reasons, the most pertinent ones being (1) no impact to existing RIM, and (2) interoperability with non-ebXML registries and systems (that is, the ability to export/import a Core Component to/from various registries/systems and have all of the metadata necessary to describe that Core Component "coupled" with it). Joe Nikola wrote: > > <Diego> > Can't we just map their concepts from UML to RIM's XML?? > </Diego> > > I'd say yes (CCTS UML -> RIM UML). This is what I've suggested earlier (see: > http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200304/msg00025.html). > > Nikola > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]