[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!
Yes. So I think the picture is clearer now for us all - we should first map to the RIM as it exists, and for those metadata attributes that do not map directly to RIM, we should create slots. For anything that cannot be accomodated with slots (hopefully nothing will fall in this category), we can discuss how to handle. Thoughts? Joe Farrukh Najmi wrote: > > Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > ><Quote> > >By defining a hierarchty within the ObjectType scheme for CCTS maybe. > ></Quote> > > > >I like that. How about this: On p.76 of CCTS (top), it defines several > >metadata attributes for a Core Component. Two of these are: > > > >- Dictionary Entry Name > > > To RegistryObject.name > > >- Definition > > > To RegistryObject.description > > > > >How could we best incorporate these into the registry? > > > > > > > > -- > Farrukh
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:firstname.lastname@example.org title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard