[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!
Forgive my ignorance, David, but what is CRI - where is the documentation, who is doing it, etc.? Sally -----Original Message----- From: David RR Webber - XML ebusiness [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:57 PM To: Chiusano Joseph Cc: email@example.com; CRAWFORD Mark Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff! Joe, We're still in agreement on this - its the "how to" that is the devil in the details ; -) I see two schools emerging - a) What Diego has built - which is great for drawing diagrams of maps of things - and consists of XML fragments that chain together like a net map with pointers. Seems to me this is what the CCTS are hot to have (although the Finnish is tough to read!) b) CRI approach - which is a set of semantics about each node in the map in a) above - and aimed at capturing much more details at implementation level - and facilitates the assembly of payloads and their management. Thanks, DW. ================================================= Message text written by "Chiusano Joseph" > I think we're going in circles here between early 2003 and now. Back around February, we had a long string of discussions in which all agreed that the best approach was an XML serialization (you were one of the main proponents of that approach). Have you changed your perspective? How are registry users going to assemble schemas from Core Components if they are not stored and maintained in XML format? < You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php