regrep-cc-review message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review]Kickoff!)

From: Farrukh Najmi <farrukh.najmi@sun.com>
To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 16:50:58 -0400

Chiusano Joseph wrote:

>
>So my question is: What would a UML object of a Core Component look
>like?
>
>  
>
I assume the standard way to represent UML is XMI and MOF?

-- 
Farrukh

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [regrep-cc-review] How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review]Kickoff!)
  - From: "Monica J. Martin" <monica.martin@sun.com>
- Re: [regrep-cc-review] How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review]Kickoff!)
  - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>

References:
- RE: [regrep-cc-review] How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!)
  - From: "MACIAS, Paul" <PMACIAS@lmi.org>
- Re: [regrep-cc-review] How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!)
  - From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]