[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: re: How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!)
Joe, I completely agree - its not our job to police the UML that is stored into the registry - or anything else - for that matter! If people want to add some kind of validation service - the registry supports that - but equally we have to be able to store stuff "as is". For example - XML fragments - may be invalid standalone - or may contain references to URL content we cannot verify. Also - people may post 'partial' information - as a draft - that they intend to complete later. I think when the CCTS spec' talks about 'valid' CC's they are referring to items that have been blessed and moved from 'candidate' status to 'approved'. Again that whole manage is external to the registry. The RIM provides metadata to track such processes already. Thanks, DW. ================================================== Message text written by "Chiusano Joseph" > I think that now is a good time to ask: How should the UML model of a Core Component be treated by the registry? IOW, is it simply an ExtrinsicObject whose metadata would be compliant with the CCTS spec? Or, would the metadata specified in the CCTS reside *inside* the UML model as part of its definition? I believe it's the former - but David's comment made me see the need to clarify. <
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]