[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep-cc-review] How Should UML Be Treated? (Was: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!)
Paul, OK, That works, Thanks, DW. ============================= Message text written by "MACIAS, Paul" > David, I think you're taking my comment farther than I intended. I merely meant that we have to ensure there is a mapping of the required metadata to the RIM, not that we have to define an API to extract the information out of a UML object. How the metadata gets into the registry can take a number of courses that vendors can develop. I think we need to provide the verification that the registry "can" capture the elements, not the "how". -Paul <
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]