RE: [regrep-cc-review] Moving Forward (RIM-based vs. XMLSerialization)

["CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>]

> 
> <Quote>
> leading with the RIM approach to cover off as much as we can 
> there, and
> supplementing that with limited XML-serialization as needed,
> and particularly to mitigate changes to the RIM itself.
> </Quote>
> 
> Would that mean (sorry for the multiple choice here):
> 
> (a) Mapping to current RIM architecture as much as possible, and
> covering "unmappable" items with Slots, OR
> 
> (b) Mapping to current RIM architecture as much as possible 
> and covering
> "unmappable" items with limited XML-serialization (and not Slots), OR
> 
> (c) Something else?
> 
My first choice would be (c) - identifying what needed to be added to the RIM to make all requirements mappable, but can live with (a).  In keeping with previous discussions, I would prefer we completely avoid (b).

Mark