Re: [regrep-cc-review] [LAST CALL!!!] Re: [regrep-cc-review] Moving Forward (RIM-based vs. XML Serialization)

["CRAWFORD, Mark" <MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>]

I disagree with David's suggested Modification. I think if we are to be successful we must be focused. I vote for keeping the clarity that Joe proposed.
Mark Crawford
Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
______
Logistics Management Institute
2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
(703) 917-7177   Fax (703) 917-7481 
Wireless (703) 655-4810
mcrawford@lmi.org
http://www.lmi.org
"Opportunity is what you make of it"


-----Original Message-----
From: David RR Webber - XML ebusiness <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>
To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
CC: CCRev <regrep-cc-review@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Fri Jun 06 16:00:01 2003
Subject: RE: [regrep-cc-review] [LAST CALL!!!] Re: [regrep-cc-review]  Moving Forward (RIM-based vs. XML  Serialization)

Joe,

Obviously I'm NOT in 100% agreement with this approach.

I'm OK with it - upto the last sentence.  Why handcuff ourselves?

I think we can defer a decision on the last piece until we get
into the implementation details and discover what is really
needed.  At this point we're just making an educated guess
as to what might be the ultimate outcome here.  No sense
in excluding options that we are not certain over.

So I would ask that the last sentence be simply deleted 
for now.

Thanks, DW.
=======================================================
Message text written by "Chiusano Joseph"
>I think we're at the point where our majority favors a RIM-based
approach: That is, mapping to RIM where possible, and - where not
possible - either use Slots, or recommend updates to the RIM as
required. This means that we would *not* be defining an XML
serialization for Core Components in *any way*, and will leave that up
to other initiatives/groups.

Please reply to this e-mail (on the listserv) only if you are *not* in
100% agreement with what is stated above. Otherwise, we will move
forward with this approach.
<


You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php