[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!
Nikola, Did you mean CCTS UML -> RIM XML (rather than RIM UML)? If so, could you please elaborate on why there would need to be such a mapping? My understanding is that we would not need to touch the UML inside a CC/BIE RegisteredObject - the submitter would have to provide all of the necessary metadata as part of the SubmitObjectsRequest. If some of the metadata has to be duplicated between the UML representation (ex: Object Type is "Core Component" versus "BIE"), then that would be a "necessary burden" on the submitter, not the registry. Joe Nikola wrote: > > <Diego> > Can't we just map their concepts from UML to RIM's XML?? > </Diego> > > I'd say yes (CCTS UML -> RIM UML). This is what I've suggested earlier (see: > http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200304/msg00025.html). > > Nikola > > You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:email@example.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard