Re: [regrep-cc-review] Kickoff!

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Nikola,

Did you mean CCTS UML -> RIM XML (rather than RIM UML)? If so, could you
please elaborate on why there would need to be such a mapping? 

My understanding is that we would not need to touch the UML inside a
CC/BIE RegisteredObject - the submitter would have to provide all of the
necessary metadata as part of the SubmitObjectsRequest. If some of the
metadata has to be duplicated between the UML representation (ex: Object
Type is "Core Component" versus "BIE"), then that would be a "necessary
burden" on the submitter, not the registry.

Joe

Nikola wrote:
> 
> <Diego>
> Can't we just map their concepts from UML to RIM's XML??
> </Diego>
> 
> I'd say yes (CCTS UML -> RIM UML). This is what I've suggested earlier (see:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200304/msg00025.html).
> 
> Nikola
> 
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php
begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard