[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ObjectTypes for CCTS
Chiusano Joseph wrote: ><JMC> >Our most recent discussions have been: A Core Component is either a >Basic Core Component (BCC) or Aggregate Core Component (ACC). Therefore, >not only are Aggregate Core Components a particular category of Core >Components, but Basic Core Components are as well. > >There is no special registry treatment for this requirement - it is >explanatory. ></JMC> > > > Apologies for being out of touch of late. I hope the following is not an off the wall suggestion or already been discussed. Should there not be an extension to the ObjectType scheme defined for CCTS mapping? Such a extension would have a tree somthing like this: |-------------BasicCoreComponent ExtrinsicObject---------CoreComponent----------------| |-------------AggregateCoreComponent Such a tree should be rooted under ExtrintrinsicObject. BTW Nikola and I have discussed that the canonical ObjectType scheme in 2.5 is not right. We think it should be simplified so -The only child of ObjectType should be RegistryObject and the current tree under that node -all other non RIM types such as user defined ObjectTypes are descendents of ExtrinsicObject This provides for a better model where for example a CoreComponent IS A ExtrinsicObject. This is more natural. Thoughts? -- Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]