OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep-cc-review message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] ObjectTypes for CCTS

In a nutshell, Diego has taken all of the CCTS object types (12 in all)
and classified them as follows:

Object Type
CCTS Objects
 |   |    |

Farrukh and Nikola have proposed:

Object Type
  |	     |	
Registry  Extrinsic  
 Entry     Object    etc.
	 |   |    |

Farrukh and Nikola's approach was accepted on our TC call yesterday. Is
everyone (especially Diego) comfortable with this representation of Core
Component Object Types?


Diego Ballvé wrote:
> Attached is what could be the "ObjectTypes for CCTS" extension,
> using rim/rs 2.1. I think it is aligned with our talks.
> It is not under ExtrinsicObject, though it would be quite easy to
> change, if that is desirable.
> Also, 1 more level can be added to separate what is now separated
> only by comments in the xml file.
> Diego
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:farrukh.najmi@sun.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:41 PM
> To: Chiusano Joseph
> Cc: CCRev
> Subject: [regrep-cc-review] ObjectTypes for CCTS
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> ><JMC>
> >Our most recent discussions have been: A Core Component is either a
> >Basic Core Component (BCC) or Aggregate Core Component (ACC). Therefore,
> >not only are Aggregate Core Components a particular category of Core
> >Components, but Basic Core Components are as well.
> >
> >There is no special registry treatment for this requirement - it is
> >explanatory.
> ></JMC>
> >
> >
> >
> Apologies for being out of touch of late. I hope the following is not an
> off the wall suggestion or already been discussed.
> Should there not be an extension to the ObjectType scheme defined for
> CCTS mapping? Such a extension would have a tree somthing like this:
>            |-------------BasicCoreComponent
> ExtrinsicObject---------CoreComponent----------------|
> |-------------AggregateCoreComponent
> Such a tree should be rooted under ExtrintrinsicObject.
> BTW Nikola and I have discussed that the canonical ObjectType scheme in
> 2.5 is not right. We think it should be simplified so
> -The only child of ObjectType should be RegistryObject and the current
> tree under that node
> -all other non RIM types such as user defined ObjectTypes are
> descendents of ExtrinsicObject
> This provides for a better model where for example a CoreComponent IS A
> ExtrinsicObject. This is more natural.
> Thoughts?
> --
> Farrukh
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                                                Name: SubmitObjectsRequest_CCConcepts_1.xml
>    SubmitObjectsRequest_CCConcepts_1.xml       Type: NOTEPAD File (text/xml)
>                                            Encoding: base64
>                                         Description: SubmitObjectsRequest_CCConcepts_1.xml
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]