RE: [regrep-cc-review] ObjectTypes for CCTS

[Diego Ballvé <diego.ballve@republica.fi>]

> >In a nutshell, Diego has taken all of the CCTS object types 
> (12 in all)
> >and classified them as follows:
> >
> >Object Type
> >     |
> >CCTS Objects
> > |   |    |
> >ACC ASCC BCC etc.
> >
> >Farrukh and Nikola have proposed:
> >
> >Object Type
> >     |
> >RegistryObject
> >  |	     |	
> >Registry  Extrinsic  
> > Entry     Object    etc.
> >	 |   |    |
> >	ACC ASCC BCC etc.
> >
> >  
> >
> mm1: Does Diego have any thoughts about any impacts he may 
> see with this latter approach, given his working experience?

I've made 1 comment in another mail, that I'd like to see
CCTS objects grouped under a CCTS node. Except for that, I
don't see any problems for nesting it under ExtrinsicObject.
In fact, it makes sense because in our approach an ACC is an
ExtrinsicObject.

Diego