Bypass Properties?

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Team,

I'm wondering if we can bypass the notion of Properties (as defined in
CCTS) in registry, and associate Data Types directly with BCCs without
having an intermediary entity (Property). So the attributes of "Property
Term" and "Cardinality" that belong to Core Component Properties (see
[S10], p. 76) would now belong to Basic Core Components (and Association
Core Components as well I believe).

In light of that, I've taken my previously sent "Properties/Data Types"
notes document and have repeated and reworded the requirements that
reference Properties, to no longer reference them (please see attached).
Please let me know if this makes sense - also in light of Figure 7-1 on
p.75 of CCTS.

Like many of us in the US I'll be in transit tomorrow for July 4th, so
I'll be off of e-mail (back Monday). I would like to wish everyone here
in the US a very Happy Fourth of July.

Thanks,
Joe

Properties-Data Types_UPDATED - Notes.doc

begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard