Re: [Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] BCC as RIM Association]

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Forwarded on behalf of Diego. Attached please find the figure that Diego
references at the end, which does not contain "CC Property" as an entity
(i.e. it more closely represents where we are going with this).

Thanks again for this Diego - we're reached a new plateau here.

Joe

Diego Ballvé wrote:
> 
> > The only further modification I would make to this excellent figure is
> > to not represent "CC Property" as an entity, as it is here (and was in
> > the CCTS Figure 7-1). We've been talking about "relocating" the CC
> > Property attributes (Property Term and Cardinality) elsewhere  - more
> > specifically:
> >
> > Property Term - an attribute of BCC
> > Cardinality   - an attribute of BCC (occurrences of a BCC
> > within an ACC)
> > and ASCC (occurrences of an ASCC within another ACC)
> 
> Absolutely. It should be like that. And it is, but inheritance and
> relations are mixed in that figure (what might look confusing).
> See the last one I've sent, withouth inheritances.
> 
> Diego

begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard