Re: [Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] Core Components Issue: Representation of Aggregate Core Components]

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Yes - that makes sense. 

Using parts of the CCTS p.12 example, I'm seeing this as follows:

- Person. Details: A stored ACC

- Address. Details: A stored ACC

- ResidenceAddress. Details: A stored [name pending - is this an ABIE,
another ACC, or some other type of entity?]

- Person. Residence. Address - A stored ASCC, that can be represented in
the registry as an Association. The Association would carry the ASCC
name in its attributes (which would be Slots).

And if there is a need to create another ASCC using "Address. Details"
"joined" to a different ACC (which there most likely would be), this
could simply be another Association.

Joe

"CRAWFORD, Mark" wrote:
> 
> I wrote -
> 
> > I am not sure I agree with the notion that an ASCC can stand
> > on its own in the registry.  I believe it must always be
> > associated with at least one ACC.
> 
> One slight correction to the following - I don't mean to imply that the ASCC should not be a separate entry in the registry, only that it must have a direct correlation with its associated ACC that describes its properties.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php
begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard