Re: [Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] Core Components Issue: Representationof Aggregate Core Components]

[Farrukh Najmi <farrukh.najmi@sun.com>]

Chiusano Joseph wrote:

><Quote7>
>So BCC's and ASCC's are completely symmetrical. The registry should
>consider both as properties of an ACC (with their own (U)uid's of
>course). 
></Quote7>
>
>Focusing on the (U)uid's comment: Would it be advantageous for an ASCC
>to have its own UUID in the registry? If we represent ASCCs with
>Associations, is this possible?
>
>  
>
my vote: Yes and Yes.

Associations *ARE* RegistryObjects and therefor have an id attribute. If 
we believe (as I do) that ASCC map naturally to an Association then it 
would have its own id and its own idenependent existince. This is how 
UML models and Association class.

-- 
Farrukh