OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep-cc-review message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [Fwd: [regrep-cc-review] Core Components Issue: Representationof Aggregate Core Components]

Chiusano Joseph wrote:

>So BCC's and ASCC's are completely symmetrical. The registry should
>consider both as properties of an ACC (with their own (U)uid's of
>Focusing on the (U)uid's comment: Would it be advantageous for an ASCC
>to have its own UUID in the registry? If we represent ASCCs with
>Associations, is this possible?
my vote: Yes and Yes.

Associations *ARE* RegistryObjects and therefor have an id attribute. If 
we believe (as I do) that ASCC map naturally to an Association then it 
would have its own id and its own idenependent existince. This is how 
UML models and Association class.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]