[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] UBL Review of CCTS: Use of Qualifiers forObject Class Terms and Property Terms
Absolutely. In fact, I'm in the process of collecting all our "assumptions" (the issue below, our handling of Properties, etc.) and sending them to the CCTS Team in the next 1-2 days to allow them to provide feedback to us if they feel that we have missed some major points. If we don't receive any feedback (or what we consider to be insufficient feedback), we'll stick with our assumptions and document them in our final report to the CCTS Team. Joe Monica Martin wrote: > > >Chiusano: I'm recalling our example of "ResidenceAddress. Details", where we were > >questioning whether "Residence" results from one of the 8 context > >drivers (it does not appear to). So in summary, we're not the only group > >questioning that aspect. > > > >Unless there are strong objections (and please voice them now with lots > >of supporting reasons), our handling will be to consider > >"ResidenceAddress. Details" an ACC rather than an ABIE, because I don't > >see where "Residence" is tied to one of the 8 context categories. A > >question posed to the CCTS Team of this several weeks ago has resulted > >in no response. > > > > > mm1: Joe, I suggest we ask again and reinforce our concern with those > questions raised by UBL. Perhaps it will elicit a response. > Thanks.
begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:email@example.com title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard