Re: [ubl-lcsc] UBL Result Paper of CC Implementation Verification

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

UBL LCSC,

Comfort in numbers, perhaps: In reviewing this document, I noted at
least one common concern that we (the OASIS/ebXML Registry TC Core
Components Review Subcommittee) have had in our analysis of the CCTS
spec. 

Referencing Proposal 10:

<Quote>
Use of Qualifiers for Object Class Terms and Property Terms

More clarification in use of qualifiers for object class terms and
property terms. 

Should the qualifier come from one of the context drivers only? 
</Quote>

In the CCTS p.12 example with "ResidenceAddress. Details", we have
questioned whether "Residence" results from one of the 8 context
drivers (as it does not appear to). We asked the CCTS Team this question
several weeks ago, and are anxiously awaiting a response. Therefore, we
are currently considering "ResidenceAddress. Details" to be an ACC
rather than an ABIE, because it does not appear to be associated with
one of the 8 context categories. 

So in the Registry, we would allow a user to add an Object Class
Qualifier of "Residence" to the ACC of "Address. Details", and the
resulting ACC would considered to be "derived" from the "base" ACC of
"Address. Details" (i.e. we would associate the 2 entities in the
registry). Once the user classifies the ACC (whether it be "Address.
Details" or "ResidenceAddress. Details") in the Registry according to
one of the 8 context categories, an ABIE will result ("US_Address.
Details" or "US_ResidenceAddress. Details").

We're at the point where we're starting to write our Technical Note, so
unless we're made aware that "Residence" does indeed belong to one of
the 8 context categories (and which one it is), we will consider it to
be an ACC in our final deliverable.

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton
Chair, OASIS/Registry TC Core Components Review Subcommittee

> "Stuhec, Gunther" wrote:
> 
> Hello Allan,
> 
> you'll find the results from the UBL LCSC of the CC implementation
> verification process as an attached file.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
>         Gunther
> 
> <<UBL Comments for Implementation Verification V1p0.doc>>
> 
>                                                                    Name: UBL Comments for
>                                                                          Implementation
>                                                                          Verification V1p0.doc
>    UBL Comments for Implementation Verification V1p0.doc           Type: WINWORD File
>                                                                          (application/msword)
>                                                                Encoding: base64
>                                                         Download Status: Not downloaded with
>                                                                          message
> 
>     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl-lcsc/members/leave_workgroup.php
begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@bah.com
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard