OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep-cc-review message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Issue #1: Unique Identifiers

Additional background regarding Mark's references below:

The temporary ID Mark references is on p.31 of CCTS spec. Examples are:


According to my interpretation of the CCTS spec, it does not elaborate

- Why such an ID is temporary;
- What it is replaced with (if anything);
- How it is tracked;
- When it ceases to exist;

Unless my interpretation is incorrect, this leaves us lots of room for
discussion (as per Mark's questions below). Please provide thoughts as
Mark requested.


"CRAWFORD, Mark" wrote:
> This isd a very interesting question. CCTS calls for the assognmentv of A unique temp identifier. This temp I'd is independent of the registry I'd. Should we store both? Should we replace the T3mp I'd with the registry I'd? My inclination is with the latter, except I am not sure what the impact on tracability is.  Thoughts?
> Mark Crawford
> Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
> W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
> Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
> Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
> Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
> ______
> Logistics Management Institute
> 2000 Corporate Ridge, McLean, VA 22102-7805
> (703) 917-7177   Fax (703) 917-7481
> Wireless (703) 655-4810
> mcrawford@lmi.org
> http://www.lmi.org
> "Opportunity is what you make of it"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi <farrukh.najmi@sun.com>
> To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
> CC: CCRev <regrep-cc-review@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Fri Aug 22 22:17:05 2003
> Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Issue #1: Unique Identifiers
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> >Team,
> >
> >Here is the first issue from the 8/21 Registry TC review:
> >
> >ISSUE: Requirement [S1] states that Core Components should have a Unique
> >Identifier. In our Registry, we already have a 128-bit UUID.
> >
> >QUESTION: Will the UUID suffice? Or should this unique identifier be
> >more "human-readable", for example: "BCC00003" (Basic Core Component
> >#3).
> >
> >
> >
> I would personally like to see our specs allow use of any URN for an id
> in future. This would require making provisions for maximizing the
> chances that any such URNs are universally unique.
> If CCRIM forces our hand on this then I would be OK with it.
> --
> Farrukh
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]