[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] Issue #3: P.12 Example in the Registy
>Chiusano1: <Quote1> > > >>QUESTION: Do we need 2 new Association Types here - "ExtendedFrom" and >>"RestrictedFrom"? Or just simply one Association Type named >>"DerivedFrom?" If so, should we handle this the same as W3C Schema? > That is, an extension would contain only the additional BCCs, and a >>restriction would contain the BCCs from the "base" ACC that are being >>carried over. >> >>mm1: I would prefer Association type. >></Quote1> >> >>Chiusano2: Did you mean 1 Association Type or 2? >> >> mm2: Assocation Type 2 - DerivedFrom
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]