RE: [regrep-cc-review] New CCTS finalized

["MACIAS, Paul" <PMACIAS@lmi.org>]

Joe,

My understanding is that we proceed with our plans to provide feedback.

I'd say the only ramification for us is that since the 2.0 is an official "approved-for-production-use" specification that we make sure our TN is referencing that version instead of 1.9 which was a "for-review-purposes" document.

I was mistaken on earlier identification of S7 as being changed. It was S10 and S56 that had a change applied to them.  Specifically, the phrase "not applicable" was added to the text on cardinality in both.  I didn't see an impact to our mapping based on those changes, since we're not storing properties.  Do you agree?

Regards,

Paul 


-----Original Message-----
From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:51 PM
To: MACIAS, Paul
Cc: CCRev
Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] New CCTS finalized


Paul,

Can you please find out what this means for our Implementation
Verification purposes? No matter what, we'll incorporate Core Components
in the registry architecture in some form, but I'd like to know if we
are still required to give feedback to the CCTS folks.

Thanks,
Joe

"MACIAS, Paul" wrote:
> 
> FYI....
> 
> UN/CEFACT announces release of Core Components Technical Specifications
> UN/CEFACT Core Components Technical Specifications ready for production
> 
> http://webster.disa.org/cefact-groups/tmg/news20030825-2.html
> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> Apparently the rules that had edits in the final 2.0 version compared to 1.9 were S7 and S56.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul Macias
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php.